Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-spec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-spec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00311 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Spec Quality Review
5-dimension spec quality gate with discuss protocol.
Inputs
- All spec docs in /spec/
- Quality gate config from specs/quality-gates.md
Dimensions
| Dimension | Weight | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness | 25% | All sections present with substance |
| Consistency | 25% | Terminology, format, references uniform |
| Traceability | 25% | Goals→Reqs→Arch→Stories chain |
| Depth | 25% | AC testable, ADRs justified, stories estimable |
Review Process
- Read all spec documents from /spec/
- Load quality gate thresholds from specs/quality-gates.md
- Score each dimension
- Run cross-document validation
- Generate readiness-report.md + spec-summary.md
- Run DISCUSS-003:
- Artifact: /spec/readiness-report.md
- Perspectives: product, technical, quality, risk, coverage
- Handle verdict per consensus protocol
- DISCUSS-003 HIGH always triggers user pause
Quality Gate
| Gate | Score |
|---|---|
| PASS | >= 80% |
| REVIEW | 60-79% |
| FAIL | < 60% |
Output
Write to /artifacts/:
- readiness-report.md: Dimension scores, issue list, traceability matrix
- spec-summary.md: Executive summary of all spec docs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 466c7aab6748
review-spec is a command published in the GitHub repository catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow (2,125 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 311 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
verify-claim
Walk a claim through the SIFT method (Stop, Investigate, Find better coverage, Trace).
beat-brief
Draft a daily beat briefing from the files in sample-docs/.
cross-review
Run GitHub Copilot CLI and OpenAI Codex against the current git diff for cross-model review.
init
Initialize configurations for Supabase local development.
skill-refresh
You are running inside a headless Claude Code session in the neo4j-skills repository. Goal: scan Neo4j release notes and deprecation pages, then update any SKILL.md and references/ files that are stale, outdated, or missing new features. Open no PRs or commits — output only file edits. The workflow will handle git and…
gofer:check-workspace
Check whether this repo is initialized for Gofer and explain any missing or stale scaffold.