Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CBirkbeck/mathlib-qualityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cbirkbeck/mathlib-quality/pre-submit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cbirkbeck/mathlib-quality/pre-submit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cbirkbeck/mathlib-quality/pre-submit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cbirkbeck/mathlib-quality/pre-submit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cbirkbeck/mathlib-quality/pre-submit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.07945 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.03178 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00795 |
Grade A, and why
pre-submit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 737 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pre-submit - Pre-PR Submission Checklist
Final verification before submitting a PR to mathlib.
Usage
/pre-submit [file_path or directory]
/pre-submit --reset-intake (re-ask the Step 0a chain questions and rewrite the session file)
On Tau Ceti, use
/tauprinstead. It is the same discipline specialised to that repo's actual mechanics —tauceti-reviewon your own subscription, contests in the rubric thread,--force-with-leasepushes, target markers and author claims, scoreboard polling./pre-submitstays the generic checklist for mathlib and everything else.
Checklist
0. Scope and Provenance (roadmap projects)
- Chain intake answered once and persisted — not re-asked per PR
- Roadmap-named sources checked before the code was written; ported not rederived
- Open PRs checked for duplication — before writing, and again before creating
- No declaration claims mathlib-absence on a search-only basis (untruncated full-name
grep and a compiled
exampleprobe)
1. Compilation
-
lake buildsucceeds without errors - No warnings in modified files
- All
sorryremoved - No
#check,#print,#evaldebugging statements
2. File Quality
For each modified file:
- File length ≤ 1500 lines
- All lines ≤ 100 characters
- Proper copyright header
- Module docstring present
- Imports organized and minimal
3. Code Quality
- No bare
simp(usesimp only) - No
set_option maxHeartbeats(a proof that needs one is slow — run/buzzto diagnose and fix it; never raise the limit) - No
set_option trace.* - No
set_option pp.* - Instance names are explicit
- Naming follows conventions
4. Documentation
- All public definitions have docstrings
- All public theorems have docstrings (if non-obvious)
- Docstrings are informative and accurate
5. Linter Compliance
- No linter errors
- Any
@[nolint]is justified
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 737 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 73d24fca1bd9
pre-submit is a command published in the GitHub repository CBirkbeck/mathlib-quality (35 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 7,945 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.