Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccevans/bobbycodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-ux)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-ux/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-ux.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00059 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00024 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
bobby-ux scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Load and follow the skill in .claude/skills/bobby-ux/SKILL.md to review the specified page or feature.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A bfa7780fe0c4
bobby-ux is a command published in the GitHub repository ccevans/bobbycode (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 59 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
hatch3r-design-system-create
Create a project design system from brand assets or an elicitation dialog — DTCG 2025.10 token emission, 3-tier taxonomy (primitive → semantic → component), OKLCH ramps, dual output design.md + design-tokens.json, gated on WCAG 2.2 AA contrast, 100% theme parity, and 0 dangling aliases.
content-visual-brief
Visual brief command. Detailed design instructions, color palettes, and AI image prompts for social visuals, banners, and video frames.
generate-design-md
Génère un DESIGN.md à la racine du projet à partir du template Claude Craft + analyse des sources UI existantes (Tailwind, tokens, CSS).
lavra-design
Orchestrate the full design pipeline -- brainstorm, plan, research, revise, review, lock.
hatch3r-benchmark
Run and analyze performance benchmarks. Compare results against baselines, identify regressions, and produce performance reports.
hatch3r-refactor-plan
Plan a refactoring or migration effort -- spawn parallel researchers, produce refactoring spec, ADR(s), and phased todo.md entries for board-fill.