audit

A command for checking a codebase for security problems. It reviews dependencies, login permissions, input handling, exposed data, configuration, and secret storage.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit an entire project or a specified target and receive prioritized findings with suggested fixes.
Why use it?
It helps identify weaknesses that could let attackers access systems, inject harmful input, or obtain confidential information.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins/audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins
Per session 6 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 201 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00006 $0.00201
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00101
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00040
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00020

Measured yesterday against content hash ad478b66fce0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

  • audit — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
  • audit — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
plugins/audit/commands/audit.md · 25 lines

What it actually says

Context

  • Package.json dependencies: @package.json
  • Environment files: !find . -name ".env*" -o -name "config.*" | head -10
  • Potential security files: !find . -name "*secret*" -o -name "*key*" -o -name "*password*" | head -10

Your task

Perform a security audit focusing on:

  1. Dependency vulnerabilities: Check for known CVEs
  2. Authentication/Authorization: Review auth implementations
  3. Input validation: Check for injection vulnerabilities
  4. Data exposure: Look for sensitive data leaks
  5. Configuration security: Review security configurations
  6. Secrets management: Ensure proper secret handling

Target: $ARGUMENTS (if specified, otherwise audit entire codebase)

Provide prioritized findings with remediation steps.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 25 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A ad478b66fce0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit is a command published in the GitHub repository ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins (926 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 201 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.