Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins/code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00176 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Context
- Current git status: !
git status - Recent changes: !
git diff HEAD~1 - Recent commits: !
git log --oneline -5 - Current branch: !
git branch --show-current
Your task
Perform a comprehensive code review focusing on:
- Code Quality: Check for readability, maintainability, and adherence to best practices
- Security: Look for potential vulnerabilities or security issues
- Performance: Identify potential performance bottlenecks
- Testing: Assess test coverage and quality
- Documentation: Check if code is properly documented
Provide specific, actionable feedback with line-by-line comments where appropriate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 23 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 6733b9e528e6
code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins (931 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 176 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
create-pull-request
Provides comprehensive PR creation guidance with GitHub CLI, enforcing title conventions, following template structure, and offering concrete command examples with best practices.
pr-issue-resolve
Follow these steps to analyze suggested changes (e.g., review comments, inline suggestions, or requested modifications) in a GitHub Pull Request (PR) and resolve them efficiently. The goal is to review, understand, plan fixes, apply changes, test, and update the PR while maintaining code quality and collaboration.
openapi-expert
Use this agent when you need to update, synchronize, or validate the OpenAPI specification (openapi.yml) against the actual REST API implementation. This includes adding new endpoints, updating request/response schemas, fixing discrepancies between the spec and code, or ensuring complete API documentation coverage.
husky
Sets up and manages Husky Git hooks by configuring pre-commit hooks, establishing commit message standards, integrating with linting tools, and ensuring code quality on commits.
pr-review
Reviews pull request changes to provide feedback, check for issues, and suggest improvements before merging into the main codebase.
create-pr
Streamlines pull request creation by handling the entire workflow: creating a new branch, committing changes, formatting modified files with Biome, and submitting the PR.