Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebaseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00161 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quick Review
Fast review of staged changes. Critical findings only — no style nits.
Instructions
-
Get the staged diff:
git diff --cached -
Review for critical issues ONLY:
- Layer boundary violations (core importing infrastructure)
- Security vulnerabilities (injection, auth bypass, secret exposure)
- Correctness bugs (wrong logic, missing error handling for real cases)
- SOLID violations that affect correctness (LSP breaks, leaky abstractions)
-
Skip: style, naming, formatting, minor improvements. This is the fast pass.
-
For each finding: file:line, what's wrong, why it matters, suggested fix.
-
If no critical findings, say "No critical issues in staged changes."
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ccd9fdcc0da9
review is a command published in the GitHub repository cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 161 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
converge
Run an unattended review→fix→re-review loop on the current branch until the reviewer has no findings at or above Medium, then push once. Findings stay in a local scratch file and are never posted to GitHub. Stops early on oscillation, a red test suite, or a 4-review cap.
extend
Capture a mid-PR sub-idea and implement it onto the current open PR's branch — no new branch, no new PR. Preserves Verify → Review → Deliver.
implement
Drive a feature implementation end-to-end from a ticket or spec — branch, plan, build, verify, review, deliver.
hotfix
Ship a fast branch-based P0 hotfix — diagnose, implement, open a ready-for-review PR, then verify + review after (deferred by design).
security-review
Depth-first security audit of the current git diff — OWASP Top 10, secret leakage, insecure-by-default APIs, and language-specific foot-guns. Pass a PR number to audit a specific PR's diff.
release
Release manager for frontend and mobile. Writes App Store notes, user-facing changelog, flags stale docs and landing copy. Actions: notes | changelog | docs | sync.