Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/celigo/ai/celigo-handlebarsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/celigo/aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/celigo/ai/celigo-handlebars)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/celigo/ai/celigo-handlebars"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/celigo/ai/celigo-handlebars.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00253 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
celigo-handlebars scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Help me write (or fix) a Celigo Handlebars expression. Use the writing-handlebars skill for brace rules, the record. prefix (AFE 2.0), and context selection. For exact helper names, parameters, and examples, consult the Handlebars Helper Catalog at mcp/resources/handlebars-helpers.md (also served as celigo://resources/handlebars-helpers).
Steps:
- Ask which context the expression runs in -- mapping extract, HTTP
relativeURI/body, RDBMSquery, output filter, or file path -- since that decides the brace style ({{ }}vs{{{ }}}) and escaping. - Ask for the input record shape (or a sample) if it matters.
- Produce the expression, explain what each helper does, and show a worked input -> output example.
- Flag common pitfalls (double-brace auto-formatting,
dateAddmilliseconds, lexicographiccompare, missing-field empty output).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 13 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A b891f4f67ccd
celigo-handlebars is a command published in the GitHub repository celigo/ai (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 253 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
awesome-chatgpt
Search awesome-ChatGPT-repositories for open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT and LLMs.
commit
智能生成 Git 提交信息并提交.
init
Scaffold a new MindBase project (v2 layout). Usage: /mb:init [template] [-- mission ...].
pr
Handle the full workflow from current branch state to an open, CI-monitored pull request.
doctor.es
Diagnostica problemas de inferencia LLM en Mac: asiai doctor verifica el estado de los motores, conflictos de puertos, carga de modelos y estado de la GPU.
requirement-review
需求文档多角色评审（requirement-review）：需求文档 → 7-Agent 并行评审 → 重构高质量需求文档（Runtime 受控流程，0-7 阶段状态机）.