Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CES-Ltd/LumiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-brainstorm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-brainstorm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-brainstorm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.01743 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00872 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00174 |
Grade A, and why
octo-brainstorm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 240 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/octo:brainstorm
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLAUDE
MANDATORY COMPLIANCE — DO NOT SKIP
When the user invokes /octo:brainstorm, you MUST ask the mode selection question below BEFORE starting the session. You are PROHIBITED from:
- Defaulting to Solo mode without asking
- Skipping the mode selection question
- Brainstorming solo and calling it Team mode
- Skipping the provider check or visual banner in Team mode
The user chose /octo:brainstorm for structured ideation. Follow the workflow.
Step 1: Ask Mode (MANDATORY)
You MUST use AskUserQuestion to ask this BEFORE doing anything else:
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "How should we brainstorm?",
header: "Mode",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{label: "Solo", description: "Claude-only thought partner session — fast and focused"},
{label: "Team", description: "Multi-AI brainstorm — diverse perspectives from multiple providers"}
]
}
]
})
WAIT for the user's answer before proceeding.
Step 2: Run the Selected Mode
If Solo Mode selected:
Standard thought partner session using four breakthrough techniques:
- Pattern Spotting, Paradox Hunting, Naming the Unnamed, Contrast Creation
Session flow:
- Frame the exploration topic
- Guided questioning (one question at a time — do NOT dump multiple questions)
- Challenge generic claims until specific
- Collaboratively name discovered concepts
- Export session with breakthroughs summary
See: skill-thought-partner for full documentation.
If Team Mode selected:
Step 2a: Display Visual Indicator Banner (MANDATORY)
You MUST output this banner before doing anything else. This is NOT optional — users need to see which AI providers are active and understand cost implications.
🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED** — Multi-AI Brainstorm
🔍 Brainstorm: [Topic being explored]
Providers:
🔴 Codex CLI — Technical feasibility and implementation angles
🟡 Gemini CLI — Lateral thinking and ecosystem connections
🔵 Claude — Synthesis, pattern naming, and moderation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 240 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 3aa24b0d5e02
octo-brainstorm is a command published in the GitHub repository CES-Ltd/Lumi (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 1,743 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
landing-page-generator.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
workflow-classify
Classify task size (S/M/L/XL) and recommend the appropriate workflow pipeline.
sonarqube
Analyze SonarCloud quality issues for a specific PR.
todo.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.