Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CES-Ltd/LumiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-deliver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-deliver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-deliver/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-deliver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ces-ltd/lumi/octo-deliver.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00973 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00389 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
octo-deliver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to octo-deliver — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deliver - Delivery Phase ✅
🤖 INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLAUDE
MANDATORY COMPLIANCE — DO NOT SKIP
When the user explicitly invokes /octo:deliver, you MUST execute the structured workflow below. You are PROHIBITED from doing the task directly, skipping the validation/review phase, or deciding the task is "too simple" for this workflow. The user chose this command deliberately — respect that choice.
EXECUTION MECHANISM — NON-NEGOTIABLE
You MUST execute this command by invoking the corresponding skill via the Skill tool. You are PROHIBITED from:
- ❌ Using the Agent tool to research/implement yourself instead of invoking the skill
- ❌ Using WebFetch/Read/Grep as a substitute for multi-provider dispatch
- ❌ Skipping
orchestrate.shcalls because "I can do this faster directly" - ❌ Implementing the task using only Claude-native tools (Agent, Write, Edit)
Multi-LLM orchestration is the purpose of this command. If you execute using only Claude, you've violated the command's contract.
When the user invokes this command (e.g., /octo:deliver <arguments>):
✓ CORRECT - Use the Skill tool:
Skill(skill: "octo:deliver", args: "<user's arguments>")
✗ INCORRECT:
Skill(skill: "flow-deliver", ...) ❌ Wrong! Internal skill name, not resolvable by Skill tool
Task(subagent_type: "octo:deliver", ...) ❌ Wrong! This is a skill, not an agent type
Auto Code Review & E2E Verification (MANDATORY)
Before presenting results, launch two verification agents in parallel:
Agent(model: "sonnet", subagent_type: "feature-dev:code-reviewer", run_in_background: true,
description: "Code review: deliver phase",
prompt: "Review code changes from this session. Check git diff. Report only high-confidence bugs, security issues, and convention violations.")
Agent(model: "sonnet", run_in_background: true,
description: "E2E test: deliver phase",
prompt: "Run the project's test suite. Report tests passed/failed and any regressions.")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A e42fba441fbf
octo-deliver is a command published in the GitHub repository CES-Ltd/Lumi (40 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 973 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to octo-deliver, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
codex-loop
Use Codex as a second, differently-trained reviewer of the whole repo, area by area (or of one branch's diff with --base), fix every real finding with regression tests, and loop until each area comes back clean twice in a row. Runs autonomously.
claude-loop
Use a fresh headless Claude session (Fable by default) as an independent reviewer of the whole repo, area by area (or of one branch's diff with --base), fix every real finding with regression tests, and loop until each area comes back clean twice in a row. The /codex-loop pattern on Anthropic usage. Runs autonomously.
pre-merge-check
Tu es un assistant de qualité code. Tu dois effectuer toutes les vérifications nécessaires AVANT de merger une branche, pour garantir la qualité et éviter les régressions.
deps-update
Audit and update dependencies safely.
test-suite
Run comprehensive test suite with coverage analysis.
eval
Manage eval-driven development workflow (define, check, report, list).