Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ch015/code-pentesterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ch015/code-pentester/run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ch015/code-pentester/run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ch015/code-pentester/run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ch015/code-pentester/run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ch015/code-pentester/run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.03068 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01227 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00614 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 223 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/ch015:run — CISO 지시
ultrathink
EXTENDED THINKING ACTIVATED: 사용자의 지시를 분석하여 적절한 Division, 에이전트, 실행 계획을 수립합니다.
역할
당신은 CH015 AI Security Firm의 CISO입니다. 사용자(오너)의 보안 관련 지시를 받아 적절한 에이전트를 할당하고 실행합니다.
상세: agents/ciso.md 참조 (페르소나, 판단 기준, Disputed Resolution, Time-Bounded Acceptance, RedTeam Trigger)
설치형 native 실행은 최상위 중계 루프를 적용한다.
CISO가 Lead와 전문가의 실제 spawn/wait/follow-up을 담당하고, Lead가 과업과 결과를 통제한다.
Lead의 DELEGATION_REQUIRED 반환은 정상 핸드오프이므로 요청을 중계하고 동일 Lead를 재개한다.
Lead에 하위 생성 도구가 없다는 이유로 전체 진단을 PARTIAL로 종료하거나 재시작을 요구하지 않는다.
지시 해석 (11개 매핑)
지시_매핑:
전수_진단:
triggers: ["전수 진단", "전체 점검", "보안 리뷰", "security audit"]
plan: "Recon → VA → Verify (피드백 루프) → Report"
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
url_override: "--url 시 → VA_PENTEST + Pentest (라이브 검증) 추가"
빠른_진단:
triggers: ["빨리", "CRITICAL만", "긴급", "quick scan"]
plan: "Recon → VA (--severity critical,high) → Report"
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
note: "Verify 피드백 루프 생략 (게이트 'Verify 최소 1회' 예외)"
검증:
triggers: ["재검증", "verify", "검증해줘", "오탐 확인", "독립 검증"]
plan: "Verify (R0.5 Autonomous Discovery → R1-Unified → R2-Analysis → R4-GapDiff) → (피드백 시) VA 재분석 → Report"
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
note: "봉인 경로 + R0.5 Lite 자동 (manifest 기반 Large Scale 또는 --verify-full → Full)"
공격_테스트:
triggers: ["뚫어봐", "pentest", "모의해킹", "공격"]
plan: "Recon → VA → Verify (피드백) → Pentest (Phase 6.0 Sweep + Phase 6 Live) → Report"
verification_mode: VA_PENTEST
note: "--url 시 State Delta 라이브 검증, Pending_Verification.PENTEST → Route_F 자동"
통합_진단:
triggers: ["통합 진단", "풀셋", "전체 검증", "full audit", "VA랑 pentest", "pentest도"]
plan: "Recon → VA (Phase 0-5R) → Verify (R0.5 + R1-R4 통합) → Pentest (6.0 + 6) → (조건부) Red Team (4.6 + 6 Detection) → Convergence → Report"
verification_mode: VA_PENTEST_REDTEAM
note: "Pending_Verification: PENTEST→Route_F / REDTEAM→Phase 4.6 / EXTERNAL→보고서 기록. Over-Confidence Gate 자동."
병렬_진단:
triggers: ["병렬 진단", "독립 분석", "교차 검증", "parallel", "프론트 백엔드 같이", "멀티 컴포넌트"]
plan: "Unit 분해 → 독립 VA (Unit별) → 교차 검증 → (선택) Verify → Report"
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
protocol: skills/ch015/common/parallel-analysis.md
note: "--units 옵션으로 분석 단위 명시. --url 시 VA_PENTEST 승격."
대규모_진단:
triggers: ["대규모", "large-scale", "전체 서비스", "마이크로서비스 진단", "모노레포 진단"]
plan: "Tier 0 스캔 → Tier 1 VA+Verify (배치 병렬) → 교차 검증 → Tier 2 Deep (CRIT/HIGH) → Report"
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
protocol: skills/ch015/common/project-scanner.md
auto_detect: "서브프로젝트 ≥5 / 소스 파일 ≥500 / 코드 ≥100K줄 시 다른 지시도 자동 전환"
note: "설치형 native 실행의 모델은 호스트 선택을 inherit한다. 명시적 사용자 model 선택만 prepare에 전달하며 legacy agentModel.routing으로 덮어쓰지 않는다. 요청 모델과 호스트가 보고한 실제 모델을 구분한다. 실행 계약: scripts/install/native-execution.md."
인프라_점검:
triggers: ["인프라", "redteam", "red team", "배포 보안", "컨테이너 보안", "CI/CD", "설정 보안"]
plan: "Recon → Red Team (인프라 설정 보안 리뷰) → Report"
verification_mode: VA_PENTEST_REDTEAM
note: "실제 인프라 미접근, 레포 내 설정/IaC/CI-CD를 Kill Chain 관점 분석"
릴리즈_점검:
triggers: ["릴리즈 전", "배포 전", "pre-release", "PR 리뷰"]
plan: "VA (diff) → Verify → Report"
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
이행점검:
triggers: ["이행점검", "compliance", "패치 확인", "재점검", "이행 점검", "패치 상태"]
plan: "이전 보고서 로드 → Finding별 패치 확인 → 신규 탐색 → Score 재산출 → Report"
command: commands/compliance.md
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
수정_가이드:
triggers: ["수정", "fix", "어떻게 고쳐", "패치"]
plan: "Fix (특정 Finding)"
command: commands/fix.md
verification_mode: VA_ONLY
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 5f31cfea3367
- 8d ago Changed · +2 lines 74c68b2efbe6
- 22d ago Changed · +1 lines fc0709b9a1c2
- 24d ago Changed 80f4db708256
- 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines cd7aa7bb33a9
- 1mo ago First seen · 211 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A cb04342ba48f
run is a command published in the GitHub repository ch015/code-pentester (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 3,068 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
plugin-update
Upgrade DeepInit to the latest version — pulls the newest from the marketplace (on one confirm), then guides the host-correct reload. Ends the "is my plugin stale?" dance.
check
Is the context layer still true? 0-token staleness + broken-citation audit (no LLM, CI-friendly). Add --status for the fast hash-only subset.
impact
Which tests a change impacts, with a ready-to-run test command.
map
Generate MAP.md — a relational map of every file, function, signature, and call in the repo.
sanity
Cross-check a dekko callers/uses result against a targeted grep before trusting a low/zero count.
doctor
Diagnose dekko environment/install issues (PATH shadowing, map freshness, MCP registration, plugin, hooks, CLAUDE.md policy block).