rclone_cryptdecode

An rclone command for translating encrypted cloud-storage file names into their original names, or doing the reverse.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to decode up to 10 listed names or encrypt names with the reverse option.
Why use it?
It avoids manually working out how names are represented by an rclone crypt remote, a storage layer that encrypts file names.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/chaunsin/agent-skills/rclone_cryptdecode
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chaunsin/agent-skills
Per session 8 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 340 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00008 $0.00340
Opus 5 $0.00004 $0.00170
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00068
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00034

Measured 2d ago against content hash 6520338a4fba, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rclone_cryptdecode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/rclone-cli/references/commands/rclone_cryptdecode.md · 52 lines

What it actually says

Official documentation: https://rclone.org/commands/rclone_cryptdecode/

rclone cryptdecode

Cryptdecode returns unencrypted file names.

Synopsis

Returns unencrypted file names when provided with a list of encrypted file names. List limit is 10 items.

If you supply the --reverse flag, it will return encrypted file names.

use it like this

rclone cryptdecode encryptedremote: encryptedfilename1 encryptedfilename2
rclone cryptdecode --reverse encryptedremote: filename1 filename2

Another way to accomplish this is by using the rclone backend encode (or decode) command. See the documentation on the crypt overlay for more info.

rclone cryptdecode encryptedremote: encryptedfilename [flags]

Options

  -h, --help      help for cryptdecode
      --reverse   Reverse cryptdecode, encrypts filenames

See the global flags page for global options not listed here.

See Also

  • rclone - Show help for rclone commands, flags and backends.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 52 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 6520338a4fba

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rclone_cryptdecode is a command published in the GitHub repository chaunsin/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 340 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.