generate-prp

generate-prp is a command for Claude Code from Chawengwit/MCP. It costs 22 tokens per session (659 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A command that researches your codebase and documentation, then writes a Product Requirements Prompt (PRP) from an INITIAL.md file into PRPs/{feature}.md.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to turn an INITIAL.md feature brief into a written PRP for implementation.
Why use it?
It gathers the project context needed to describe a feature, reducing the need to prepare that research and planning by hand.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/chawengwit/mcp/generate-prp
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chawengwit/MCP

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for generate-prp

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/chawengwit/mcp/generate-prp.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/chawengwit/mcp/generate-prp)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/chawengwit/mcp/generate-prp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/chawengwit/mcp/generate-prp.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 659 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.00659
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00329
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00132
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00066

Measured 3d ago against content hash bdf09fe6f85d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

generate-prp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/generate-prp.md · 72 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 72 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A bdf09fe6f85d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

generate-prp is a command published in the GitHub repository Chawengwit/MCP (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.