Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChenyCHENYU/wl-skills-designWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00228 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00091 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
设计集成评审
目标：${input:files:请提供至少一份设计产物或验证报告}
- 读取 集成评审 Skill 和 评审标准。
- 汇总 spec 43、DB 34、API 38 项结论，现场执行 D4 18 项联动和 RV 12 项报告自检。
- 词典和原型存在时作为扩展维度单独报告；缺失维度标记“未提供”，不按通过计分。
- 输出评分、等级、P0–P3、追溯矩阵、补丁任务和证据位置。
- 评审默认只读；仅在用户要求保存报告时写入
docs/review/，不得自动修改被评文件。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 15 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A ebe03eccc70d
design-review is a command published in the GitHub repository ChenyCHENYU/wl-skills-design (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 228 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.
Other commands, from other repositories
brand-generate
Generate an on-brand document from a saved Brand Profile.
render-figures
Compile all .tex and .typ figure files in a directory.
cti-report
Render case deliverables — relationship graph (PNG/SVG/Mermaid) and a polished PDF/DOCX assessment. Usage: /cti-report [--graph|--pdf].
ppt-image2-editable-rebuild
Rebuild image2 or imagegen reference slides as editable PowerPoint decks.
harness-onboarding
Generate a human-readable onboarding document from HARNESS.md, AGENTS.md, and REFLECTIONLOG.md — a friendly guide for new team members.
publish-api-docs
Generate interactive API documentation from blueprint specs (Swagger UI, Redoc, AsyncAPI).