Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/choxos/BiostatAgentnpx agentmods add commands/choxos/biostatagent/itc-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/choxos/biostatagent/itc-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/choxos/biostatagent/itc-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/choxos/biostatagent/itc-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01651 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00826 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00330 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
itc-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ITC Code Review - Expert R Code Analysis and Amendment
Review ITC analysis code for: $ARGUMENTS
Purpose
Comprehensive review of R code for indirect treatment comparison analyses (pairwise MA, NMA, MAIC, STC, ML-NMR) by an expert combining world-class ITC methodology knowledge with rigorous software engineering practices.
Review Options
Specify your preferences:
- review_type:
comprehensive(detailed) |summary(bullet points) - action:
review_only|amend(create corrected code in subfolder) - output_folder: Path for amended files (default:
./amended/) - focus_areas: Specific concerns (optional)
Review Workflow
Review Configuration
- Review type: {review_type} (comprehensive or summary)
- Action: {action} (review_only or amend)
- Output folder: {output_folder}
- Focus areas: {focus_areas}
Step 1: Understand the Analysis
Before reviewing, understand:
- What ITC method is being used?
- What is the research question?
- What data structure is present?
- What packages are being used?
Step 2: Methodological Review
Check for issues in these areas:
Pairwise Meta-Analysis (meta, metafor, bayesmeta)
- Correct effect measure for outcome type
- Appropriate fixed vs random effects choice
- Heterogeneity properly assessed (Q, I², τ², prediction interval)
- Publication bias addressed (if ≥10 studies)
- Sensitivity analyses included
- Forest plot generated
- Knapp-Hartung adjustment used (if applicable)
Network Meta-Analysis (netmeta, gemtc)
- Network connectivity verified
- Transitivity assumption assessed
- Consistency tested (node-splitting, net heat)
- Multi-arm correlations handled
- Rankings reported with uncertainty
- Convergence checked (Bayesian)
- Priors specified and justified (Bayesian)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 248 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A c43413d43dbe
itc-review is a command published in the GitHub repository choxos/BiostatAgent (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,651 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-open-prs
Command "review-open-prs" from The-Artificer-of-Ciphers-LLC/skills-from-the-artificer, covering batch pr review directive — all open prs i did not author, phase a — enumerate target prs & build the queue, phase b — per-pr directive (runs once per queued $pr), 0. context anchoring and 1. preconditions.
review
/review [optional: specific files or PR number].
review-code
Agent review pass plus manual checklist for correctness, security, performance, and accessibility.
review
Recent git commits: !git log --oneline -10.
skill-eval
Validate and audit quality of AI agent slash commands and skills — checks YAML frontmatter, description length, jargon, directive verbs, and duplicates. Run after adding or editing commands.
complexity
Forces the laziest solution that actually works — simplest, shortest, most minimal — on every coding task, and audits a diff, plan, or whole repo for over-engineering. Channel a lazy senior developer who has seen every over-engineered codebase and been paged at 3am for one: lazy means efficient, not careless, and the…