Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/choxos/mathvizagent/review-animationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/choxos/MathVizAgentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/choxos/mathvizagent/review-animation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/choxos/mathvizagent/review-animation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/choxos/mathvizagent/review-animation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01676 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00838 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00335 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
review-animation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/review-animation - Code Review Workflow
Review existing Manim animation code for production quality standards and provide actionable improvements.
Workflow Steps
Step 1: Code Submission
User provides their Manim code for review.
Step 2: Automated Analysis (@code-reviewer)
Analyze the code against the following checklist:
Critical Issues (Must Fix)
- Magic numbers in positioning
- Missing waits after complex content
- Inconsistent or excessive colors (>5)
- No object tracking for cleanup
- Using
FadeOut(*self.mobjects) - Wrong scene type for camera work
Warnings (Should Fix)
- No
next_section()in long scenes - Multiple concepts in single scene
- Animations too fast (<0.5s run_time)
- No semantic color system
- Repeated code that should be components
- Hardcoded text sizes
Suggestions (Nice to Have)
- Could use LaggedStart instead of loop
- Custom component would improve readability
- Rate function could enhance feel
- Camera work could improve focus
Step 3: Generate Review Report
## Code Review: [Scene/File Name]
### Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Quality Score | [A/B/C/D] |
| Critical Issues | [count] |
| Warnings | [count] |
| Suggestions | [count] |
| Lines of Code | [count] |
### Critical Issues
#### 1. [Issue Title] (line X)
**Current Code**:
```python
element.shift(LEFT * 3.5)
Problem: Magic number makes code brittle and unclear.
Fix:
element.move_to(LEFT * config.frame_width / 4)
Warnings
1. [Warning Title] (line Y)
Current Code:
self.play(Write(complex_formula))
# Next animation immediately
Problem: No time for viewer to comprehend complex formula.
Recommendation: Add wait after complex content.
self.play(Write(complex_formula), run_time=2)
self.wait(4) # Time to comprehend
Suggestions
1. [Suggestion Title] (lines A-B)
Current Pattern:
for item in items:
self.play(Write(item), run_time=0.5)
Improved Pattern:
self.play(LaggedStart(*[Write(item) for item in items], lag_ratio=0.1), run_time=3)
Benefit: Smoother animation, single render pass, professional feel.
Refactored Code
If requested, provide complete refactored version:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 290 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 599cd6214900
review-animation is a command published in the GitHub repository choxos/MathVizAgent (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,676 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
psql-query
Run ad-hoc PostgreSQL analytics queries against dev/test database.
github-actions
Design, review, secure, and debug GitHub Actions workflows — reusable workflows, OIDC federation, SHA pinning, token scoping, promotion orchestration, and CI failure diagnosis.
fluxcd
FluxCD entry point — routes to the right workflow based on what you need. Live cluster issue → structured 5-workflow debug trace. Repo health check → 6-phase audit (discovery, validation, API compliance, best practices, security). Helm chart review → helmchart. Starts by asking one question to confirm the right mode.
genshijin-compress
Markdown・テキストファイルを原始人形式へ安全圧縮.
save
Save this conversation as a new or existing reusable context.
import
Import a shared context bundle, or take a teammate's newer copy of one you already have.