Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christopherlouet/claude-baseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/growth-landing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/growth-landing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/growth-landing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/growth-landing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/growth-landing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00490 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00245 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
growth-landing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LANDING Agent
Create or optimize an effective landing page.
Context
$ARGUMENTS
Objective
Design a landing page with a single goal and a clear CTA, structured to maximize conversion (hero, social proof, problem, solution, features, pricing, FAQ).
Workflow
- Define the single goal and the target audience
- Write the value proposition (headline + subtitle)
- Structure the sections (hero, social proof, problem, solution, features, how it works, testimonials, pricing, FAQ, final CTA)
- Optimize the copywriting (benefits > features, AIDA)
- Configure the CTAs (action verb + benefit, visible, contrast)
- Optimize the technical side (performance < 3s, SEO, mobile, schema.org)
- Define the priority A/B tests (headline, CTA, hero image)
Expected output
Proposed structure with written content
- Hero (headline, subtitle, CTA)
- Main sections with copy
Technical checklist
- SEO tags, Open Graph, analytics, responsive
Metrics to track
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Bounce rate | < 50% |
| Conversion rate | > X% |
Related agents
| Agent | When to use it |
|---|---|
/growth:growth-seo |
Optimize search ranking |
/growth:growth-ab-test |
Test variants |
/growth:growth-analytics |
Track conversions |
/qa:qa-perf |
Optimize performance |
See also
For deeper conversion-copy methodology, pair this with coreyhaines31/marketingskills (copywriting, cro, marketing-psychology sub-skills) — install per docs/recipes/recommended-vendor-skills.md §"Corey Haines — coreyhaines31/marketingskills". Use the vendor for the deep copy/psychology layer; keep this command for the foundation workflow orchestration (SEO, performance, A/B tests).
IMPORTANT: One landing page = one goal = one CTA. No distractions.
YOU MUST include social proof — even minimal at launch.
NEVER use technical jargon — speak the customer's language.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 59 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6f42e56a2d1f
growth-landing is a command published in the GitHub repository christopherlouet/claude-base (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 490 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
perf-audit
Performance audit for web applications.
scaffold
Scaffold project components from templates.
ui-review
Retroactive visual audit of UI implementation with 1-4 scoring per dimension.
ccc-multi-frontend
Frontend-focused multi-model workflow: Research → Plan → Execute → Review, Gemini-led.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.