Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christopherlouet/claude-baseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/wcag-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/wcag-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/christopherlouet/claude-base/wcag-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01028 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00514 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
wcag-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WCAG-AUDIT Agent (Accessibility)
Accessibility audit based on WCAG 2.1/2.2 and the axe-core reference.
Audit target
$ARGUMENTS
Objective
Identify accessibility violations in the code and propose concrete fixes to reach WCAG 2.1/2.2 level AA.
Workflow
- Scan UI files (components, pages, layouts, CSS)
- Audit the 11 categories: images, forms, keyboard, buttons/links, colors, ARIA, structure, tables, frames, deprecated, WCAG 2.2
- Classify each issue by impact (Critical/Serious/Moderate/Minor)
- Distinguish violations (auto-detectable) from needs-review (manual verification)
- Identify priority fixes with file:line
Impact levels
| Level | Definition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Completely blocks access | Fix immediately |
| Serious | Significant impact on usability | Fix before release |
| Moderate | Hinders user experience | Plan a fix |
| Minor | Desirable improvement | Backlog |
Audit categories
| # | Category | Key rules | WCAG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Images/media | alt, SVG, object, video, autoplay | 1.1.1, 1.2.2, 1.4.2 |
| 2 | Forms | labels, select, errors, autocomplete | 4.1.2, 3.3.1, 1.3.5 |
| 3 | Keyboard | focus, traps, skip-link, scrollable, nested | 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.4.1 |
| 4 | Buttons/links | accessible names, descriptive links | 4.1.2, 2.4.4 |
| 5 | Colors | AA ratios, color alone, UI elements | 1.4.3, 1.4.1, 1.4.11 |
| 6 | ARIA | attrs, roles, relations, aria-hidden | 4.1.2, 1.3.1 |
| 7 | Structure | lang, title, headings, landmarks, regions | 3.1.1, 2.4.2, 1.3.1 |
| 8 | Tables | th, scope, headers, caption | 1.3.1 |
| 9 | Frames | title, uniqueness, focus | 4.1.2, 2.1.1 |
| 10 | Deprecated | blink, marquee, meta-refresh, autoplay | 2.2.1, 2.2.2 |
| 11 | WCAG 2.2 | target-size 44x44px, focus-not-obscured | 2.5.8, 2.4.11 |
Expected output
Summary
- Overall score: [X/100]
- WCAG level reached: [A/AA/AAA]
- Violations: [N] (Critical: X, Serious: X, Moderate: X, Minor: X)
- Needs Review: [N]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 95 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 414a59488e99
wcag-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository christopherlouet/claude-base (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,028 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
perf-audit
Performance audit for web applications.
scaffold
Scaffold project components from templates.
ui-review
Retroactive visual audit of UI implementation with 1-4 scoring per dimension.
ccc-multi-frontend
Frontend-focused multi-model workflow: Research → Plan → Execute → Review, Gemini-led.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.