Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/cirwel/unitares/checkingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cirwel/unitaresWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cirwel/unitares/checkin)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cirwel/unitares/checkin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cirwel/unitares/checkin.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
checkin scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Before calling tools, check the local workspace cache inventory.
Use the shared helper in this repo:
scripts/client/session_cache.py list
If the newest entry contains parent_agent_id, treat it as local lineage context for attribution, not proof that the current process owns that UUID.
If current binding is unclear, call identity() first to inspect the active binding.
If you must test a cached UUID, use an advanced proof-owned rebind only when a
matching current in-process continuity_token is available. Do not use legacy
cache files as token sources.
If this is a fresh process and no ownership proof is available, use
/governance-start to mint a fresh identity. Add parent_agent_id only when
this process is genuinely inheriting work from a finished predecessor; do not
infer lineage from the cache alone.
If no local continuity state exists and the current identity is unclear, use /governance-start first.
Call process_agent_update for the current agent once per assistant turn to establish a behavioral baseline. Also call it after meaningful milestones, before/after high-risk work, or when uncertainty/drift shows up.
Inputs:
response_text: concise summary of what was actually accomplishedcomplexity: estimate0.0-1.0confidence: honest estimate0.0-1.0- use the active session binding or
client_session_id; do not auto-injectcontinuity_tokenintoprocess_agent_update - use
response_mode="compact"by default for Codex; reserveresponse_mode="mirror"for drift, guide/pause verdicts, or diagnostic review
Guidelines:
- Do not check in after every trivial edit or tool call.
- Prefer one baseline check-in per assistant turn.
- Add a check-in for meaningful milestones, completed steps, or decision points.
- If you had to rebind with
identity(), only use that restored binding when the response shows strong/proof-owned continuity. - If recent local edit context exists, use it to improve the summary, but do not report raw file churn as if it were real progress.
- If deterministic results already happened in the workflow, mention them concretely instead of speaking in generalities.
After the call:
- report the verdict
- report identity-assurance or continuity warnings when they are surfaced
- report margin or edge warnings when present
- report any guidance briefly
- report mirror signals or reflection prompts when present
- if verdict is
pauseorreject, recommendrequest_dialectic_review - if verdict is
guide, summarize the guidance and adjust behavior
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 54 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 2099286d78c4
checkin is a command published in the GitHub repository cirwel/unitares (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 561 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
psm
/oh-my-claudecode:psm is a compatibility alias for /oh-my-claudecode:project-session-manager.
speckit.tasks
Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
coder-eval-implement-plan
Implement an approved codereval plan phase by phase with risk-scaled per-phase review, then a final code review.
release
This compatibility command keeps /oh-my-claudecode:release available without loading the full release skill description in every Claude Code session.
self-improve
This compatibility command keeps /oh-my-claudecode:self-improve available without loading the full self-improve skill description in every Claude Code session.
nyann:diff-profile
Compare two nyann profiles side-by-side and show what changes between them: hooks, branching, CI, documentation, extras, governance. Useful before switching profiles to understand the impact.