Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/cjerochim/compound-workflow/test-browsergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cjerochim/compound-workflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.02436 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01218 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00487 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00244 |
Grade A, and why
test-browser scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 415 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A b0554733c612
test-browser is a command published in the GitHub repository cjerochim/compound-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 2,436 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
expect
Diff-aware AI browser testing — reads the git diff, maps changes to affected pages via the route map, generates a targeted test plan, and executes it via agent-browser (Rust daemon + CDP, ARIA-tree-first) with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, or running regression checks on…
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
stark-quality-gate
Use this command when a web UI should be maintained, released, compared across runs, or used as public proof. It turns visual QA into a repeatable local/CI gate instead of a one-off screenshot check.
open
SoDam-Design-Kit open 대시보드 — 검증 이력·판정서·스크린샷을 브라우저로 열람 + 재검증.
playwright-cli
Use this skill whenever the user wants to automate a browser, scrape web content, take screenshots or PDFs of pages, fill out forms, click through UI flows, or run end-to-end tests — without using an MCP server. This skill drives Playwright directly from the bashtool via Node.js scripts. Trigger whenever the user says…
qa
Dispatch a verifiable browser task to the qa-tester subagent. Use for regression checks, smoke tests, and any task with a clean pass/fail outcome. Supports an EXHAUSTIVE mode that verifies every control behind an honesty gate.