Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/classicchins/compounding-marketingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00869 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00348 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
cm-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/cm:audit — Marketing Audit
Comprehensive marketing health check across all channels and assets.
What It Does
A structured audit of your entire marketing operation — messaging consistency, channel performance, funnel health, and asset quality. Run quarterly or before major strategic shifts.
Time Investment
60-90 minutes
Process
1. Foundation Health Check
Positioning & Messaging:
- Review positioning canvas — still accurate? Market shifted?
- Check messaging across homepage, emails, ads — consistent?
- Brand voice alignment — does everything sound like the same company?
- Value props — still resonating? Evidence from metrics?
Action: Flag any drift. If positioning needs refresh → /cm:position
2. Channel Performance Audit
For each active channel, assess:
| Channel | Questions |
|---|---|
| Website/SEO | Organic traffic trend? Top pages performing? Content gaps? |
| List growth rate? Open/click rates? Deliverability issues? | |
| Social | Engagement trend? Best-performing formats? Audience growth? |
| Paid | ROAS by channel? CAC trend? Creative fatigue? |
| Content | Publishing cadence? Quality consistency? Distribution working? |
Score each: 🟢 Healthy / 🟡 Needs attention / 🔴 Broken
3. Funnel Health
Map conversion at each stage:
- Awareness → Interest (traffic → engagement)
- Interest → Consideration (engagement → signup/demo)
- Consideration → Decision (signup → paid)
- Decision → Retention (paid → active user)
Identify: Where is the biggest drop-off? That's your highest-leverage fix.
4. Asset Inventory
Catalog what exists:
- Landing pages (how many? conversion rates?)
- Email sequences (active? performing?)
- Content library (blog posts, case studies, guides)
- Ad creatives (fresh or fatigued?)
- Sales collateral (up to date?)
Flag: Outdated assets, missing critical assets, underperforming assets.
5. Competitive Position Check
- Run quick competitive scan — anyone new?
- Pricing still competitive?
- Feature gaps that affect positioning?
- Messaging they're using that's working?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 124 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 37d18f0c2d04
cm-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository classicchins/compounding-marketing (8 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 869 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
cm-audit compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cm-auditclassicchins/compounding-marketing | Command | 8 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |