Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/classicchins/compounding-marketingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/classicchins/compounding-marketing/cm-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00869 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
cm-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/cm:audit — Marketing Audit
Comprehensive marketing health check across all channels and assets.
What It Does
A structured audit of your entire marketing operation — messaging consistency, channel performance, funnel health, and asset quality. Run quarterly or before major strategic shifts.
Time Investment
60-90 minutes
Process
1. Foundation Health Check
Positioning & Messaging:
- Review positioning canvas — still accurate? Market shifted?
- Check messaging across homepage, emails, ads — consistent?
- Brand voice alignment — does everything sound like the same company?
- Value props — still resonating? Evidence from metrics?
Action: Flag any drift. If positioning needs refresh → /cm:position
2. Channel Performance Audit
For each active channel, assess:
| Channel | Questions |
|---|---|
| Website/SEO | Organic traffic trend? Top pages performing? Content gaps? |
| List growth rate? Open/click rates? Deliverability issues? | |
| Social | Engagement trend? Best-performing formats? Audience growth? |
| Paid | ROAS by channel? CAC trend? Creative fatigue? |
| Content | Publishing cadence? Quality consistency? Distribution working? |
Score each: 🟢 Healthy / 🟡 Needs attention / 🔴 Broken
3. Funnel Health
Map conversion at each stage:
- Awareness → Interest (traffic → engagement)
- Interest → Consideration (engagement → signup/demo)
- Consideration → Decision (signup → paid)
- Decision → Retention (paid → active user)
Identify: Where is the biggest drop-off? That's your highest-leverage fix.
4. Asset Inventory
Catalog what exists:
- Landing pages (how many? conversion rates?)
- Email sequences (active? performing?)
- Content library (blog posts, case studies, guides)
- Ad creatives (fresh or fatigued?)
- Sales collateral (up to date?)
Flag: Outdated assets, missing critical assets, underperforming assets.
5. Competitive Position Check
- Run quick competitive scan — anyone new?
- Pricing still competitive?
- Feature gaps that affect positioning?
- Messaging they're using that's working?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 124 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 37d18f0c2d04
cm-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository classicchins/compounding-marketing (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 869 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.