Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/retrogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resourcesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/retro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/retro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/retro.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00528 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
retro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Retrospective Workflow
You are generating a retrospective analysis of recent development work.
Steps
-
Determine time period: Read
$ARGUMENTS:today— Last 24 hoursthis-week(default) — Last 7 daysthis-sprint— Last 14 days- Or a specific date range
-
Gather data: Analyze the git history for the period:
git log --since="<period>" --oneline --stat git log --since="<period>" --format="%h %s" --no-merges git shortlog --since="<period>" -sn -
Analyze patterns:
- Commit types: Count feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore commits
- Hotspots: Files changed most frequently (potential complexity/instability)
- Churn: Files with many additions AND deletions (rework indicator)
- Test coverage changes: New test files added vs source files added
- Bug fix ratio: Fixes vs features (high fix ratio = quality issues)
- PR metrics: If available, check average PR size and review time
-
Generate the retrospective:
## Retrospective: [period] ### Summary X commits, Y files changed, Z lines added, W lines removed ### What Went Well - [Completed features, good patterns observed, test improvements] ### What Could Improve - [Recurring bug patterns, high-churn files, missing tests, tech debt] ### Metrics | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Features added | X | | Bugs fixed | Y | | Tests added | Z | | Hotspot files | [list] | | Fix/feature ratio | X:Y | ### Action Items - [ ] [Specific, actionable improvement with owner] - [ ] [Specific, actionable improvement with owner] - [ ] [Specific, actionable improvement with owner] -
Present: Show the retrospective and highlight the top 3 action items.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 64 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A cc84c0402269
retro is a command published in the GitHub repository Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 528 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
clarify
Walk through inbox items applying the GTD decision tree. Usage: /gtd:clarify [--id gtd-xxx].