Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resourcesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00308 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00123 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Workflow
You are conducting a comprehensive code review.
Steps
-
Determine scope: Check
$ARGUMENTSfor a specific file, branch, or PR number.- If empty: Review uncommitted changes (
git diff+git diff --staged) - If a file path: Review that specific file
- If a branch: Review
git diff main...<branch> - If a PR number: Use
gh pr diff <number>
- If empty: Review uncommitted changes (
-
Gather context: Read project conventions from CLAUDE.md, .editorconfig, linter configs, and existing code patterns.
-
Launch the reviewer: Use the Task tool to spawn the
revieweragent with:Review the following code changes: Scope: [determined scope] Project conventions: [summary from CLAUDE.md] Apply the full review checklist: correctness, security, readability, performance, testing, maintainability. Only report findings with confidence >= 80. Provide file:line references and concrete fix suggestions.
-
Summarize: Present the review findings organized by severity. Include a summary count of issues by category.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 93e5ed4c8891
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 308 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).