Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/plugin install code-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/start)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/start/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/start.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.18080 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.07232 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.03616 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01808 |
Grade A, and why
start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 513 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Comprehensive Code Review
Run a multi-agent code review with partitioned deep review, deterministic hygiene checks, model routing, and validated findings. Supports two modes:
- Local mode (default): Reviews changes and presents findings in the terminal
- GitHub mode (
--github): Reviews a PR, posts inline comments, and writes a summary file
Usage
/start # Review open PR diff for current branch, or the diff since the branch forked from the default branch if no PR
/start staged # Review only staged changes
/start file1 file2 # Review specific files
/start 123 # Review PR #123 diff locally (no posting)
/start --github # GitHub CI: auto-detect PR from branch, post inline comments
/start --github 123 # GitHub CI: review PR #123, post inline comments
/start --hygiene-only # Fast hygiene-only check (zero LLM tokens)
/start --base develop # Diff against a specific base branch
/start --since-last-review # Review only changes since last successful review
/start --full-review # Force full diff (disable auto-incremental)
/start --depth shallow # Built-ins only (no critic-gates); see Depth Tiers below
/start --depth deep # Standard + future heavy reviewers (Impact Analyzer slot)
Depth Tiers (PLN-807)
The --depth flag selects which reviewer fleet runs. Default standard. Bare /start invocations preserve historical behavior.
- shallow — hygiene + BHA (partitioned at >5000 LOC) + BHB + unified_auditor + verifier. Skips signal extraction, coverage planning/critic, and all
critic-gates.jsonentries. Static spawn spec; no routing/critic decisions. Hygiene emits atier_mismatch_nudgeMEDIUM finding (categoryCoverage) when the PR's diff size, schema/migration paths, or public API surface suggest standard would catch more. - standard — current behavior. Full fleet with signal-driven routing, coverage critic, repo-specific critic activation via
critic-gates.json. Budget arithmetic reserves BHA partitions FIRST (Phase 4) and caps total domain critics across both required and best-effort buckets at the tier-uniformDOMAIN_CRITIC_CAP = 3(standard and deep alike). Required critics dropped by the cap emit coverage-gap findings. - deep — standard plus two deep-only conditional core reviewers. The always-on Design Critic runs on every deep review (no trigger): a software-design craftsmanship reviewer covering module depth/information hiding, SOLID, dependency direction and layer boundaries, and project structure (drawing on A Philosophy of Software Design, SOLID, and Clean Architecture); it is
source: "core"so it is exempt fromDOMAIN_CRITIC_CAP, runs on Sonnet, is code-intelligence-aware (uses whichever indexing MCP server the operator's session provides for module layout and dependency direction, else grep), and emitscategory: "Code Quality"findings scoped to design flaws this change introduces or worsens. The signal-gated Impact Analyzer (FEA-1401), a cross-file blast-radius reviewer, runs when signal extraction detectsexported_symbol_changeorsymbol_deletion. The analyzer identifies changed exported symbols, finds external usages outside the diff (via whichever indexing MCP server the operator's session provides, else grep), and emits findings withexternal_impact[]listing every callsite that breaks under the new signature. Cost-capped at 30 symbols × 50 callsites with a 5-minute wall budget; deferred symbols surface in the Coverage Plan footer. Impact findings carrycategory: "ImpactAnalysis"and are verifier-audited per-entry (cited callsites read, snippet content-matched, grep replayed). ≥2 verified BLOCKING/HIGH Impact findings escalate the verdict toNEEDS_ATTENTION(Rule 6). Deep's extra breadth comes from these two reviewers rather than a wider domain-critic cap.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 87c64b8501e3
- 14d ago Changed 48cc76afa70c
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines ede51107072d
- 1mo ago Changed a9fb296bb6b5
- 1mo ago First seen · 508 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A cf64c2559c38
start is a command published in the GitHub repository closedloop-ai/claude-plugins (122 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 18,080 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-branch
Review an existing branch holistically before merging — blast radius, conventions, security, and spec compliance.
work-pr
Creates a complete and well-documented Pull Request.
review-pr-staging
Staging review mode — comprehensive review of staging branch before deploy to main.
pr-manager
Comprehensive pull request management with ruv-swarm coordination for automated reviews, testing, and merge workflows.
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from shyftlabs/continuum, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
review-issue
Review and respond to a GitHub issue.