web-source-review

A command that checks a web page as an information source rather than simply summarizing it. It evaluates who published it, whether it is a first-hand source, what evidence supports its claims, and whether it can be cited.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a URL before relying on it in research, documentation, reports, or citations.
Why use it?
It helps developers judge whether online information is trustworthy and separates verified facts from unclear or unsupported claims. It also highlights when a page should be checked against an official or original source.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kit/web-source-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kit
Per session 42 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 533 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00042 $0.00533
Opus 5 $0.00021 $0.00267
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00107
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00053

Measured 2d ago against content hash 72bf2bc8b25b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

web-source-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/web-source-review.md · 37 lines

What it actually says

/web-source-review

対象URL: $ARGUMENTS

手順

  1. web-content-extraction skill の URL 検証手順に従って抽出する$ARGUMENTS は信頼できない入力として扱い、 検証済みの単一 URL だけを単一引数で渡す:
    ~/.claude/skills/web-content-extraction/scripts/run-node.sh \
      ~/.claude/skills/web-content-extraction/scripts/defuddle-url.mjs '<検証済みURL>'
    
  2. success:falsewarnings がある場合は「抽出不完全」と明示し、信頼性評価に反映する。
  3. 本文の要約ではなく、情報源としての信頼性をレビューする。

出力(日本語で整理)

  • 情報源の種類: 公式発表 / 規制当局 / 企業ブログ / 報道 / 個人ブログ / フォーラム 等
  • 一次情報か二次情報か: 判断と根拠
  • 著者・発行元: 実在性・専門性・利害関係(バイアス要因)
  • 公開日・更新日: 鮮度(published/fetchedAt を併記)
  • 主張: この情報源が述べている主要な主張
  • 根拠: 主張を支える証拠・出典の有無と質
  • 不明点: 検証できない/曖昧な点
  • 追加確認すべき一次情報: クロスチェックに使うべき公式・規制当局・原典の候補
  • 引用に使えるか: 可否と条件(逐語引用できない法令等は不可など)

注意

  • 確実な情報源がない事項は「不明」と記す(推測しない)。
  • 重要点は複数ソースでクロスチェックし、矛盾は整理して結論を出す。
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 37 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 72bf2bc8b25b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

web-source-review is a command published in the GitHub repository cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kit (147 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 533 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.