Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kit/web-source-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00533 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00267 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
web-source-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/web-source-review
対象URL: $ARGUMENTS
手順
- web-content-extraction skill の URL 検証手順に従って抽出する。
$ARGUMENTSは信頼できない入力として扱い、 検証済みの単一 URL だけを単一引数で渡す:~/.claude/skills/web-content-extraction/scripts/run-node.sh \ ~/.claude/skills/web-content-extraction/scripts/defuddle-url.mjs '<検証済みURL>' success:falseやwarningsがある場合は「抽出不完全」と明示し、信頼性評価に反映する。- 本文の要約ではなく、情報源としての信頼性をレビューする。
出力(日本語で整理)
- 情報源の種類: 公式発表 / 規制当局 / 企業ブログ / 報道 / 個人ブログ / フォーラム 等
- 一次情報か二次情報か: 判断と根拠
- 著者・発行元: 実在性・専門性・利害関係(バイアス要因)
- 公開日・更新日: 鮮度(
published/fetchedAtを併記) - 主張: この情報源が述べている主要な主張
- 根拠: 主張を支える証拠・出典の有無と質
- 不明点: 検証できない/曖昧な点
- 追加確認すべき一次情報: クロスチェックに使うべき公式・規制当局・原典の候補
- 引用に使えるか: 可否と条件(逐語引用できない法令等は不可など)
注意
- 確実な情報源がない事項は「不明」と記す(推測しない)。
- 重要点は複数ソースでクロスチェックし、矛盾は整理して結論を出す。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 37 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 72bf2bc8b25b
web-source-review is a command published in the GitHub repository cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kit (147 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 533 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.