Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to coder/httpjail. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coder/httpjail/main/.claude/commands/pr-compress.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coder/httpjailWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/coder/httpjail/pr-compress)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/coder/httpjail/pr-compress"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/coder/httpjail/pr-compress/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/coder/httpjail/pr-compress"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/coder/httpjail/pr-compress.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00091 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00018 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
pr-compress scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Deeply review existing change.
Try to find opportunities for DRY. i.e. where you can push the net balance of code additions as low as possible while simultaneously improving readability and behavior.
Do not venture into changes beyond the scope of the PR.
Also, make sure the body and title of the PR are concise and reflect the totality of the changes. Take note of recent commits on the base branch for the correct style of PR title.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b9d8c8c7d60a
pr-compress is a command published in the GitHub repository coder/httpjail (961 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed CC0-1.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 91 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-11.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.