Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/coeusyk/inference-x/opsx-applygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coeusyk/inference-xWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/coeusyk/inference-x/opsx-apply)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/coeusyk/inference-x/opsx-apply"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/coeusyk/inference-x/opsx-apply.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01165 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00583 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
/opsx-apply scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to OPSX: Apply — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /opsx:apply add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select
Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g.,
/opsx:apply <other>). -
Check status to understand the schema
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")planningHome,changeRoot, andactionContext: planning scope and edit constraints- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
-
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --jsonThis returns:
contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema)- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked"(missing artifacts): show message, suggest using/opsx:continue - If
state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Workspace guard: If status JSON reports
actionContext.mode: "workspace-planning"andallowedEditRootsis empty, explain that full workspace apply is not supported in this slice. Treat linked repos and folders as read-only context, ask the user to select an affected area through an explicit implementation workflow, and STOP before editing files. -
Read context files
Read every file path listed under
contextFilesfrom the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
-
Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
-
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file:
- [ ]→- [x] - Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
-
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Output On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx:archive`.
Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 156 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 5ba3d06a51fc
/opsx-apply is a command published in the GitHub repository coeusyk/inference-x (2 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,165 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to OPSX: Apply, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
enforce_standards
CRITICAL: Before running the code standards enforcer, we must prepare the stack properly and abort if there are merge conflicts.
OPSX: Continue
Continue working on a change - create the next artifact (Experimental).
spec-research
需求 → 约束集(并行探索 + OPSX 提案).
OPSX: Fast Forward
Create a change and generate all artifacts needed for implementation in one go.
slack-gif-creator
Toolkit for creating animated GIFs optimized for Slack, with validators for size constraints and composable animation primitives. This skill applies when users request animated GIFs or emoji animations for Slack from descriptions like "make me a GIF for Slack of X doing Y".
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.