Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/coleam00/archon/code-review-fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coleam00/ArchonWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00179 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Fix
I ran a code review and found these issues:
Code review (file or description): $1
Scope: $2
Process
If the code review is a file, read the entire file first to understand all issues.
For each fix:
- Explain what was wrong and why
- Show the fix with before/after context
- Create and run relevant tests to verify
After all fixes, run validation:
bun run validate
Fix any issues that arise until all checks pass:
- Type checking:
bun run type-check - Linting:
bun run lint(zero warnings enforced) - Formatting:
bun run format:check - Tests:
bun run test
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 34 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A f38c4746aa3d
code-review-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository coleam00/Archon (23,339 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 179 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
triage
Classify/label newly opened GitHub issues missing labels.
fix-issues
Diagnose, reproduce, then fix reproducible open GitHub issues in parallel: one clean worktree/issue; symlink build artifacts to avoid rebuilds.
review-prs
Parallel PR triage: decide merge-worthiness, prepare rebased worktrees, fix blockers, return them for human merge.
release
Release all packages at specified version.
cleanup
Autonomous cleanup-loop iteration: discover ONE target → complete execution → verify → report. Runs stateless: derive from current tree; assume prior runs left it consistent.
hello
Say hello.