review

review is a command for Claude Code from contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc. It costs 11 tokens per session (753 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A command that runs an Antigravity code review on the current local Git state, meaning the files and changes in a repository.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review staged, unstaged, untracked, or branch-based changes, with optional --wait, --background, or --base arguments.
Why use it?
It provides a review of the current work without modifying files, and can wait for the result or run the review in the background.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the ask-antigravity plugin — 4 commands, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to review staged, unstaged, untracked, or branch-based changes, with optional --wait, --background, or --base arguments.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc
Claude Code
/plugin install ask-antigravity

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ask-antigravity, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 commands, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 11 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 753 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00011 $0.00753
Opus 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00301
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00151
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00075

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 659f6b368295, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/ask-antigravity/commands/review.md · 60 lines

What it actually says

Run an Antigravity review through the shared plugin runtime.

Raw slash-command arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Core constraint:

  • This command is review-only.
  • Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
  • Your only job is to run the review and return Antigravity's output verbatim to the user.

Execution mode rules:

  • If the raw arguments include --wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
  • If the raw arguments include --background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task.
  • Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
    • Use git status --short --untracked-files=all to see scope.
    • Use git diff --shortstat --cached and git diff --shortstat for working-tree changes.
    • Use git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD if --base <ref> was passed.
    • Treat untracked files as reviewable work even when diff stats are empty.
    • Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny (~1-2 files, no directory-scale change). Otherwise recommend background.
    • When in doubt, run the review rather than declaring there is nothing to review.
  • Then use AskUserQuestion exactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with (Recommended):
    • Wait for results
    • Run in background

Argument handling:

  • Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
  • Do not strip --wait or --background yourself.
  • Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
  • The companion script accepts --wait and --background but treats them as no-ops; Claude Code's Bash(..., run_in_background: true) is what actually detaches the run.
  • /ask-antigravity:review does not take focus text. For steerable reviews, use /ask-antigravity:adversarial-review.

Foreground flow:

  • Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/antigravity-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
  • Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
  • Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
  • Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.

Background flow:

  • Launch the review with Bash in the background:
Bash({
  command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/antigravity-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
  description: "Antigravity review",
  run_in_background: true
})
  • Do not call BashOutput or wait for completion in this turn.
  • After launching, tell the user the Antigravity review is running in the background and the output will appear in chat when it finishes.
  • While waiting, completion arrives as a BashOutput notification from the harness. Do not poll temp directories, do not search for sidecar files (this plugin does not create any), and do not invoke agy or the companion script directly to "check status" — that runs a separate agy session and does not surface the in-flight one.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 659f6b368295

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository contrapuntal/antigravity-cli-plugin-cc (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 753 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.