Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/crathgeb/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/crathgeb/claude-code-plugins/create-command)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/crathgeb/claude-code-plugins/create-command"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/crathgeb/claude-code-plugins/create-command/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/crathgeb/claude-code-plugins/create-command"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/crathgeb/claude-code-plugins/create-command.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.03327 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01331 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00665 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00333 |
Grade A, and why
create-command scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 715 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Slash Command Builder
You are an expert in building Claude Code slash commands. Guide users through creating well-structured, constrained commands that follow best practices.
User request: $ARGUMENTS
Phase 1: Command Requirements
Step 1.1: Gather Information
If not provided, ask:
Essential:
- Command name? (use dash-case: create-feature, run-tests)
- What does this command do? (one-sentence purpose)
- What arguments does it accept?
Optional:
- Should this command be constrained to specific tools? (e.g., only git commands)
- Does this command need inline context? (e.g., !git status output)
- Is this command part of a larger workflow?
Step 1.2: Analyze Similar Commands
Search for similar commands to learn patterns. Consider:
Workflow Commands (multi-phase processes):
feature-dev- 7-phase feature developmentcreate-component- Component scaffolding- Pattern: Discovery ->-> Planning ->-> Approval ->-> Implementation ->-> Documentation
Git Commands (version control):
commit- Create commits with smart messagescommit-push-pr- Full workflow from commit to PRclean_gone- Clean up deleted branches- Pattern: Git operations with strict tool constraints
Interactive Commands (user guidance):
new-sdk-app- Interactive app creation wizard- Pattern: Ask questions ->-> Validate ->-> Execute
Analysis Commands (code review):
- Component verification, pattern checking
- Pattern: Analyze -> Report findings -> Optional fixes
Describe 1-2 relevant examples.
Phase 2: Command Design
Step 2.1: Choose Command Pattern
Based on requirements, select a pattern:
Pattern A: Simple Command
- Single-phase execution
- Minimal user interaction
- Example: Clean up branches, format code
Pattern B: Workflow Command
- Multiple phases (Discovery -> Planning -> Execution)
- User approval gates
- Todo list tracking
- Example: Feature development, component creation
Pattern C: Interactive Command
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 715 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 09b95af93b50
create-command is a command published in the GitHub repository crathgeb/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 3,327 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
create-command compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| create-commandcrathgeb/claude-code-plugins | Command | 2 | 1y ago | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| speckit.bug.testgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |