Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/custos/angry-ralph/angry-executegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Custos/angry-ralphWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00807 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
angry-execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/angry-execute Command
Run Phases 4-6: Split the plan into sections, execute each via TDD Ralph Loop, and run final review.
1. Argument Parsing
--auto(optional) -- Skip confirmation prompts.--rebuild <section>(optional) -- Delete a section's done marker and re-run it.
If --rebuild is passed:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/pipeline.sh remove_done . "<section>"
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/pipeline.sh remove_from_list . "completed_sections" "<section>"
Both the .done marker file and the completed_sections array entry are removed, so the section will be re-executed.
2. Prerequisites
Verify .ralph-state/pipeline.json exists:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/pipeline.sh read . current_phase
If empty → error: "No pipeline state found. Run /angry-architect or /angry-ralph first."
Verify Phases 1-2 complete:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/pipeline.sh check_done . architect
If exit non-zero → error: "Phases 1-2 not complete. Run /angry-architect @spec.md first."
3. Phase 4: SPLIT
Check if Phase 3 was run:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/pipeline.sh check_done . review
If not done, ask user: "Phase 3 (review) was not run. Proceed without review, or run /angry-review plan first?"
Follow the angry-ralph skill's Phase 4 (SPLIT) instructions.
4. Phase 5: EXECUTE (Ralph Loop + TDD)
For each section in .planning/sections/index.md:
Read completed sections:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/pipeline.sh read . completed_sections
Skip sections already in completed_sections. For incomplete sections, execute via TDD Ralph Loop per the skill instructions. Run mechanical gates before section review:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/mechanical-gates.sh run_all "<test_runner>" "<section_spec>" "."
On section completion, append to completed_sections:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/pipeline.sh append . completed_sections "<section-name>"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 106 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 354fb7ef7a62
angry-execute is a command published in the GitHub repository Custos/angry-ralph (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 807 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
tdd-requirements
TDD開発の要件整理を行います。機能要件を明確化し、テスト駆動開発のための準備を行います。.
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
pm-auto-design2dev
設計レビューから実装完了まで完全自動化(設計レビュー→作業計画→TDD実装).
task-verify
PitWay: Run an inprogress task's approved verification command and persist evidence.
execute-plan
Execute an implementation plan methodically with TDD and continuous validation.
tdd
强制执行测试驱动开发工作流。首先搭建接口,生成测试,然后从实现能通过测试的最小代码。确保 80%+ 的覆盖率。.