Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to DaiOwen/ai-pulse. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DaiOwen/ai-pulse/master/.claude/commands/ai-digest.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DaiOwen/ai-pulseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/daiowen/ai-pulse/ai-digest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/daiowen/ai-pulse/ai-digest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/daiowen/ai-pulse/ai-digest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/daiowen/ai-pulse/ai-digest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/daiowen/ai-pulse/ai-digest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00277 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
ai-digest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ai-digest
解析 $ARGUMENTS，按 CLAUDE.md 执行。
| $ARGUMENTS | 动作 |
|---|---|
morning |
搜索 6-8 次 → 生成 HTML → git push |
noon |
搜索 3-4 次（增量，skip arxiv+theverge） → 生成 → git push |
evening |
搜索 6-8 次 → 生成 → git push |
now |
当前时间<11→morning / 11-17→noon / 17+→evening |
status |
CronList + ls archive/ + git status |
update |
git stash → git pull → 展示最近 3 commit → git stash pop |
生成要求：不读模板文件，不读旧 index.html，不执行 CronList 自检。直接搜索→生成→推送。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 11bf17c418d4
ai-digest is a command published in the GitHub repository DaiOwen/ai-pulse (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 277 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ai-news-briefing
Search for today's latest AI news and create/update a comprehensive briefing in Notion, with optional Obsidian vault publishing for graph visualization.
custom-brief
Deep-research a specific topic and produce a comprehensive news-focused briefing with optional Notion/Obsidian/Teams/Slack publishing.
ai-trend-tracker
Ask ai-trend-tracker about AI/ML news, tools, papers, courses, channels, or learning paths — always live-searched and cited.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.