Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielrosehill/Claude-Image-Production-PluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/danielrosehill/claude-image-production-plugin/group-by-camera)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/danielrosehill/claude-image-production-plugin/group-by-camera"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/danielrosehill/claude-image-production-plugin/group-by-camera/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/danielrosehill/claude-image-production-plugin/group-by-camera"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/danielrosehill/claude-image-production-plugin/group-by-camera.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00428 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
group-by-camera scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Group Images by Camera
Cluster images by EXIF camera Make + Model.
Task
-
Ask which folder to operate on — default is the current working directory. Confirm recursion; default flat.
-
Read camera metadata for each image:
exiftool -s -s -s -Make -Model -LensModel "image.jpg"Build a bucket label of the form
{Make}_{Model}with spaces and slashes replaced by hyphens (e.g.NIKON-CORPORATION_NIKON-D850,Apple_iPhone-15-Pro,SONY_ILCE-7M3). -
Bucket files:
{Make}_{Model}/— one folder per unique (Make, Model) pairno-exif/— images with no readable camera metadata (screenshots, scrubbed photos, generated art)unknown/— EXIF present but Make or Model missing
-
Preview before acting — table of bucket label → count, plus a sample filename per bucket. Wait for user confirmation. Offer to merge near-duplicate bucket names (common:
NIKON CORPORATIONvsNIKON). -
Prefer symlinks or CSV manifest over physical moves:
- Option A: symlinked subfolders
- Option B:
metadata/camera-buckets.csvwithfilename,make,model,bucket - Option C: physical move on explicit confirmation
-
Log to
notes/group-by-camera-{timestamp}.mdwith bucket counts and the no-EXIF / unknown tallies.
Notes
- Lens model is interesting but produces fragmented buckets — include it in the CSV manifest but not in the folder label.
- Phone photos often have consistent Make/Model but many firmware variants; don't try to split on firmware.
- If a user's library is dominated by
no-exif/, that usually means it was previously scrubbed — note this in the log.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 88c9ba9c9c81
group-by-camera is a command published in the GitHub repository danielrosehill/Claude-Image-Production-Plugin (21 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 428 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
group-by-camera compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| group-by-cameradanielrosehill/Claude-Image-Production-Plugin | Command | 21 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |