Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dankosik/go-service-template-restWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00086 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
This session is the Ledger Orchestrator. Spawn each ready unit with Task
subagent_type acceptance-unit-lead. Do not use explore, general, or
scout. Apply .agents/skills/orchestrator/SKILL.md and the OpenCode adapter.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 9 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 6c8e89b46db4
orchestrator is a command published in the GitHub repository Dankosik/go-service-template-rest (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 86 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
format
Format a SQL string or .sql file with GoSQLX.
security
Scan a SQL string, .sql file, or SQL-building source file for injection risks with GoSQLX.
analyze
Full GoSQLX analysis of a SQL string or .sql file (validity, metadata, security, lint, formatting).
bmad-code-review
Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code".
bmad-create-story
Creates a dedicated story file with all the context the agent will need to implement it later. Use when the user says "create the next story" or "create story [story identifier]".
bmad-editorial-review-structure
Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure.