Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dansasser/claude-code-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dansasser/claude-code-marketplace/architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dansasser/claude-code-marketplace/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dansasser/claude-code-marketplace/architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dansasser/claude-code-marketplace/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dansasser/claude-code-marketplace/architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00943 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00377 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Architecture Analysis with Ollama
Analyze system architecture, design patterns, and structural decisions.
Usage: /architect <file_or_directory> [aspect]
Aspects:
patterns: Design patterns and architectural patternsscalability: Scalability analysissecurity: Security architecturedependencies: Dependency analysisall: Comprehensive architecture review (default)
Examples:
/architect src/- Full architecture analysis/architect docs/architecture.md patterns- Pattern analysis/architect src/api/ scalability- Scalability review
You are performing architecture analysis by orchestrating ollama agents.
Target: $1 Aspect: ${2:-all}
Your Process:
-
Understand Scope:
- Check if target is file or directory
- For directories: Use
@./dir/:treeas PRIMARY input for architecture analysis - Read architecture documentation if available
- Map dependencies and relationships
-
Directory Operations for Architecture:
Architecture analysis is IDEAL for directory operations:
Aspect Primary Operation Purpose all @./dir/:treeFull structure overview patterns @./dir/:tree+@./dir/:search:classStructure + class patterns scalability @./dir/:treeModule organization security @./dir/:tree+@./dir/:search:authSecurity boundaries dependencies @./dir/:search:importImport analysis Example Architecture Prompt:
ollama-prompt --prompt "Architecture analysis: Project Structure: @./src/:tree Import Dependencies: @./src/:search:^import @./src/:search:^from Analyze: - Layer separation - Module boundaries - Design patterns - Coupling and cohesion" -
Invoke Appropriate Agent:
Specific Aspect Analysis: Use ollama-task-router agent with focused prompt:
- Target: $1
- Aspect: ${2:-all}
- For directories: Agent uses
@./dir/:treefor structure - Request specific analysis (patterns, scalability, security, dependencies)
Comprehensive Analysis (aspect=all): Use ollama-parallel-orchestrator agent:
- Perspectives: architecture, security, scalability, maintainability
- Target: $1
- Each perspective uses appropriate directory operations
- Multi-angle deep analysis
-
Analysis Framework (for agent to apply):
Structure:
- Separation of Concerns: Are responsibilities clearly separated?
- Modularity: Are modules cohesive and loosely coupled?
- Layering: Is there clear layering (presentation, business, data)?
- Abstraction: Are abstractions at appropriate levels?
Quality Attributes:
- Scalability: Can system handle growth?
- Maintainability: Is code easy to modify?
- Testability: Can components be tested independently?
- Security: Are security principles followed?
- Performance: Are performance requirements met?
Design Principles:
- SOLID principles
- DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)
- KISS (Keep It Simple)
-
Your Role:
- Invoke appropriate agent based on aspect
- Receive architectural analysis
- Format findings for user
- Highlight key insights and recommendations
-
Report Format:
## Architecture Analysis **Target:** $1 **Aspect:** ${2:-all} ### Architecture Overview - High-level structure - Key components - Design patterns identified ### Strengths - What's working well - Good architectural decisions ### Concerns - Architectural issues - Anti-patterns found - Technical debt ### Recommendations - Specific improvements - Refactoring suggestions - Pattern applications
Why Tree View is Essential for Architecture:
- Shows complete module hierarchy in ~500 tokens
- Reveals layer separation (or lack thereof)
- Exposes coupling through directory structure
- Identifies module boundaries instantly
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 141 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7fbf1d35dc8a
architect is a command published in the GitHub repository dansasser/claude-code-marketplace (9 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 943 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
architect compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| architectdansasser/claude-code-marketplace | Command | 9 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| speckit.bug.fixgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 12 | Claude Code |