review

review is a command for Claude Code from dashpot4/grok-plugin-for-claude. It costs 10 tokens per session (767 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review command that runs Grok against the current Git state, such as uncommitted changes or a branch difference. Git is the system commonly used to track code changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review working-tree changes, staged changes, untracked files, or differences between a branch and a base branch.
Why use it?
It provides a review of existing changes while keeping the command limited to reporting findings rather than modifying files.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the grok plugin — 2 skills, 17 commands, 1 agent, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit Use it to review working-tree changes, staged changes, untracked files, or differences…

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add dashpot4/grok-plugin-for-claude
Claude Code
/plugin install grok

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install grok, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills, 17 commands, 1 agent, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dashpot4/grok-plugin-for-claude/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dashpot4/grok-plugin-for-claude/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dashpot4/grok-plugin-for-claude/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dashpot4/grok-plugin-for-claude/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 767 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00010 $0.00767
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00383
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00153
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00077

Measured 2d ago against content hash f9c8276123bf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/grok/commands/review.md · 62 lines

What it actually says

Run a Grok review through the shared reviewer.

Workspace default effort (set via /grok:effort) and model are used unless overridden with --effort or --model.

Raw slash-command arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Core constraint:

  • This command is review-only.
  • Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
  • Your only job is to run the review and return Grok's output verbatim to the user.

Execution mode rules:

  • If the raw arguments include --wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
  • If the raw arguments include --background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task.
  • Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
    • For working-tree review, start with git status --short --untracked-files=all.
    • For working-tree review, also inspect both git diff --shortstat --cached and git diff --shortstat.
    • For base-branch review, use git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD.
    • Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work even when git diff --shortstat is empty.
    • Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant working-tree status is empty or the explicit branch diff is empty.
    • Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
    • In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
    • When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
  • Then use AskUserQuestion exactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with (Recommended):
    • Wait for results
    • Run in background

Argument handling:

  • Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
  • Do not strip --wait or --background yourself.
  • Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
  • However, scan for natural language effort requests (e.g. "grok max 모드", "use high effort") and ensure --effort <level> is included in the arguments passed to the companion (max intent maps to xhigh) so the workspace default can be overridden. Explicit flags take precedence.

Foreground flow:

  • Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/grok-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
  • Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
  • Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
  • Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.

Background flow:

  • Launch the review with Bash in the background:
Bash({
  command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/grok-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
  description: "Grok review",
  run_in_background: true
})
  • Do not call BashOutput or wait for completion in this turn.
  • After launching the command, tell the user: "Grok review started in the background. Check /grok:status for progress."
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago Changed · +1 lines f9c8276123bf
  2. 6d ago First seen · 61 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A d2ddee5cc23e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository dashpot4/grok-plugin-for-claude (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 767 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.