Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to DataCovey/nornweave. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DataCovey/nornweave/main/.cursor/commands/opsx-onboard.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DataCovey/nornweaveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/datacovey/nornweave/opsx-onboard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/datacovey/nornweave/opsx-onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/datacovey/nornweave/opsx-onboard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/datacovey/nornweave/opsx-onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/datacovey/nornweave/opsx-onboard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.03105 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00311 |
Grade A, and why
/opsx-onboard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to OPSX: Onboard — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 526 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Guide the user through their first complete OpenSpec workflow cycle. This is a teaching experience—you'll do real work in their codebase while explaining each step.
Preflight
Before starting, check if OpenSpec is initialized:
openspec status --json 2>&1 || echo "NOT_INITIALIZED"
If not initialized:
OpenSpec isn't set up in this project yet. Run
openspec initfirst, then come back to/opsx:onboard.
Stop here if not initialized.
Phase 1: Welcome
Display:
## Welcome to OpenSpec!
I'll walk you through a complete change cycle—from idea to implementation—using a real task in your codebase. Along the way, you'll learn the workflow by doing it.
**What we'll do:**
1. Pick a small, real task in your codebase
2. Explore the problem briefly
3. Create a change (the container for our work)
4. Build the artifacts: proposal → specs → design → tasks
5. Implement the tasks
6. Archive the completed change
**Time:** ~15-20 minutes
Let's start by finding something to work on.
Phase 2: Task Selection
Codebase Analysis
Scan the codebase for small improvement opportunities. Look for:
- TODO/FIXME comments - Search for
TODO,FIXME,HACK,XXXin code files - Missing error handling -
catchblocks that swallow errors, risky operations without try-catch - Functions without tests - Cross-reference
src/with test directories - Type issues -
anytypes in TypeScript files (: any,as any) - Debug artifacts -
console.log,console.debug,debuggerstatements in non-debug code - Missing validation - User input handlers without validation
Also check recent git activity:
git log --oneline -10 2>/dev/null || echo "No git history"
Present Suggestions
From your analysis, present 3-4 specific suggestions:
## Task Suggestions
Based on scanning your codebase, here are some good starter tasks:
**1. [Most promising task]**
Location: `src/path/to/file.ts:42`
Scope: ~1-2 files, ~20-30 lines
Why it's good: [brief reason]
**2. [Second task]**
Location: `src/another/file.ts`
Scope: ~1 file, ~15 lines
Why it's good: [brief reason]
**3. [Third task]**
Location: [location]
Scope: [estimate]
Why it's good: [brief reason]
**4. Something else?**
Tell me what you'd like to work on.
Which task interests you? (Pick a number or describe your own)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 526 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 7141f1f9c279
/opsx-onboard is a command published in the GitHub repository DataCovey/nornweave (27 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 3,105 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to OPSX: Onboard, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
slack-gif-creator
Toolkit for creating animated GIFs optimized for Slack, with validators for size constraints and composable animation primitives. This skill applies when users request animated GIFs or emoji animations for Slack from descriptions like "make me a GIF for Slack of X doing Y".
Checkpoint Commit
Commit changes at meaningful checkpoints throughout the workflow.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.