Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/bug-blitz)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/bug-blitz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/bug-blitz/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/bug-blitz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/bug-blitz.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.02951 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01180 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00590 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00295 |
Grade A, and why
bug-blitz scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · -3 lines 4c19d2faef7d
- 12d ago Changed · -2 lines eaffb9adec64
- 17d ago Changed · +22 lines 3825019e845c
- 19d ago Changed · +5 lines d6aaeb2ea6ec
- 20d ago Changed 40c142ec1985
- 23d ago Changed 6b543d18fec6
- 24d ago Changed · +2 lines 73a09f00eaa4
- 26d ago Changed 57065a9a0fef
- 27d ago Changed · -17 lines · -1 tokens per session eb17878763cf
- 1mo ago First seen · 178 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 7ba7ee42445d
bug-blitz is a command published in the GitHub repository dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,951 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
quality-review
Run the 3-agent quality review (simplifier + adversarial-reviewer + chaos-engineer) against a plan, file, or proposal.
diagnose
Surface the mutually-corrected legibility models for a codebase scope on demand. /diagnose drives the full diagnostic-legibility pipeline (build, self-challenge, cross-check) and renders the corrected architectural and domain models as a readable markdown report.
review
Verification review of a named agent's claim. Ends in acquittal or replacement.
review
Phase 50 — 6-agent parallel quality review of a completed wave (Wave 3c).
fix
A repair command that applies listed fixes from a review report, with dry-run output by default and an explicit --apply option for writing changes.
doctor
Diagnose a Rami install — checks auth, GitHub App coverage, quota, and plugin version.