Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/distill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/distill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/distill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/distill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/distill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.03900 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01560 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00780 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00390 |
Grade A, and why
distill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +11 lines 4e2948534238
- 11d ago Changed · -2 lines 9178bc3a1d25
- 14d ago Changed · +24 lines 2dafff368cbe
- 19d ago Changed · +1 lines 71387719a6fc
- 26d ago Changed 4e22eed04957
- 29d ago Changed · +58 lines 30b3498bb061
- 1mo ago Changed · +13 lines 9c794a94cf00
- 1mo ago First seen · 142 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A d3334e48d323
distill is a command published in the GitHub repository dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 3,900 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
assess
Run an AI literacy assessment — scan the repo for evidence, score three disciplines, produce a timestamped report.
review
Verification review of a named agent's claim. Ends in acquittal or replacement.
review
Phase 50 — 6-agent parallel quality review of a completed wave (Wave 3c).
usage
Check Rami quota and credit balance.
scout-meta-review
Run an interactive Scout meta-review — a system-level audit that sits above the individual session types. Checks whether sessions are running, mistake audit is trending well, proposals are flowing, KB files are healthy, and data-source coverage is consistent across session types. Runs in the current conversation.
develop
Implement skill development issues with TDD-governed workflow.