Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/delorenj/ssbnkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/delorenj/ssbnk/bmad-cis-design-thinking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/delorenj/ssbnk/bmad-cis-design-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/delorenj/ssbnk/bmad-cis-design-thinking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/delorenj/ssbnk/bmad-cis-design-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/delorenj/ssbnk/bmad-cis-design-thinking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00045 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00023 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00009 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-cis-design-thinking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@skills/bmad-cis-design-thinking
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 6 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A a1f07fc029cc
bmad-cis-design-thinking is a command published in the GitHub repository delorenj/ssbnk (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 45 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
create-excalidraw-diagram
description: "Create system architecture or technical diagram (Excalidraw) (Use any time you need a diagram)".
imitate-auto
UI design workflow with direct code/image input for design token extraction and prototype generation.
layout-extract
Extract structural layout information from reference images or text prompts using Claude analysis with variant generation or refinement mode.
style-extract
Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude analysis with variant generation or refinement mode.
workflow:ui-design:import-from-code
Import design system from code files (CSS/JS/HTML/SCSS) with automatic file discovery and parallel agent analysis.
style-skill-memory
Generate SKILL memory package from style reference for easy loading and consistent design system usage.