Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00134 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00054 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
project:review
project:review
Please review the current diffs (git diff and git diff --cached) against this project's Delphi coding standards from CLAUDE.md and the appropriate rules within rules/. Ensure that:
- Naming conventions (
T,I,E,F,A,Lprefixes) are respected. try..finallyis correctly applied to ALL unowned object creations.- There are no
withstatements. - Memory leaks are unlikely with the new changes.
- Specific database or framework constraints (Firebird, MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc.) are respected.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 27637059e054
review is a command published in the GitHub repository delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit (56 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 134 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
fix-pr
Fetch and resolve unresolved PR comments.
review-changes
Review uncommitted changes and suggest improvements.
rv
Run the local review gate before pushing.
post
Post the current OCR review to a GitHub PR.
pr-handle
../../../.agents/skills/skills-pr-handle/SKILL.md.
diff-review
Generate a visual HTML diff review, before/after architecture comparison with code review analysis.