Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/designpipe/exfig/opsx-newgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DesignPipe/exfigWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00606 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00121 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
/opsx-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to OPSX: New — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Start a new change using the experimental artifact-driven approach.
Input: The argument after /opsx:new is the change name (kebab-case), OR a description of what the user wants to build.
Steps
-
If no input provided, ask what they want to build
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Determine the workflow schema
Use the default schema (omit
--schema) unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.Use a different schema only if the user mentions:
- A specific schema name → use
--schema <name> - "show workflows" or "what workflows" → run
openspec schemas --jsonand let them choose
Otherwise: Omit
--schemato use the default. - A specific schema name → use
-
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"Add
--schema <name>only if the user requested a specific workflow. This creates a scaffolded change atopenspec/changes/<name>/with the selected schema. -
Show the artifact status
openspec status --change "<name>"This shows which artifacts need to be created and which are ready (dependencies satisfied).
-
Get instructions for the first artifact The first artifact depends on the schema. Check the status output to find the first artifact with status "ready".
openspec instructions <first-artifact-id> --change "<name>"This outputs the template and context for creating the first artifact.
-
STOP and wait for user direction
Output
After completing the steps, summarize:
- Change name and location
- Schema/workflow being used and its artifact sequence
- Current status (0/N artifacts complete)
- The template for the first artifact
- Prompt: "Ready to create the first artifact? Run
/opsx:continueor just describe what this change is about and I'll draft it."
Guardrails
- Do NOT create any artifacts yet - just show the instructions
- Do NOT advance beyond showing the first artifact template
- If the name is invalid (not kebab-case), ask for a valid name
- If a change with that name already exists, suggest using
/opsx:continueinstead - Pass --schema if using a non-default workflow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 72 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 14cde165272f
/opsx-new is a command published in the GitHub repository DesignPipe/exfig (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 606 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to OPSX: New, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
figma-start
디자이너가 개발자의 원본 PR 위에서 검수를 시작할 때 호출하는 커맨드입니다. PR 링크 하나만 주면 프로젝트 클론부터 합니다 — 검수할 프로젝트를 미리 받아둘 필요가 없습니다. 브랜치 생성·체크아웃 후 빌드해서 기기에 올려 화면까지 띄워줍니다 — 실행할 기기·에뮬레이터가 없으면 검수에 맞는 걸 설치해서 만듭니다. 그 브랜치의 커밋 이력 패널도 개발툴에 띄워줍니다 — 지금까지 반영한 검수 내용을 검수 내내 옆에 두고 볼 수 있습니다. 커밋·푸시는 하지 않습니다. 디자이너가 화면을 먼저 확인한 뒤, 필요하면 /figma-apply로 피그마 변경을 반영합니다.
handoff
디자이너 작업 완료 신호 — design/ 브랜치로 dev 브랜치 타겟 PR을 만들고, 원본 dev PR 작성자를 리뷰어로 지정.
figma-apply
피그마 변경을 현재 design/ 브랜치에 반영(커밋·푸시). /figma-start 이후에 사용.
feature
Post a feature to the Features Board on production and write tweets.
implement
Implement a feature or fix using best practices for this MCP server project.
test
Run tests and ensure code quality for the Figma Console MCP server.