Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to DesignPipe/exfig. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DesignPipe/exfig/main/.claude/commands/plan.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DesignPipe/exfigWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/designpipe/exfig/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/designpipe/exfig/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/designpipe/exfig/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/designpipe/exfig/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/designpipe/exfig/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01054 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00422 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Planning with Dependencies
Purpose: Analyze a task and break it down into subtasks with explicit dependencies, enabling parallel execution where possible.
Output Format (TOON-like)
Generate plan in this structured format:
command:
name: plan-<task-slug>
purpose: <task description>
version: 1.0
tasks[N]{id,title,description,depends_on,parallel_group,type}:
<id>,<title>,<description>,[deps],[group],[type]
...
execution_order:
phase_1:
parallel: [task_ids that can run in parallel]
phase_2:
sequential: [task_id] # build/test tasks
phase_3:
parallel: [task_ids for fixes if needed]
...
dependency_graph:
<task_id>: [list of task_ids this depends on]
...
Task Types
analysis- Code analysis, research, readingimplementation- Writing new codemodification- Changing existing codebuild- Building project/moduletest- Running testsfix- Fixing issues found by build/testsreview- Code review, validation
Dependency Rules
Critical Rules for Parallel Execution
- Independent tasks (no shared files/modules) can run in parallel
- Build tasks MUST wait for ALL parallel implementation tasks to complete
- Test tasks MUST wait for build to succeed
- Fix tasks MUST wait for test results
- Tasks modifying same file MUST be sequential
Dependency Detection
- Same file modification → sequential
- Same module modification → sequential (unless different files)
- Different modules → parallel possible
- Build depends on → all implementation tasks
- Test depends on → successful build
- Fix depends on → test results
Instructions
-
Analyze the task:
- Read relevant code files mentioned in task
- Identify affected modules/files
- Detect potential conflicts
-
Break down into subtasks:
- Create atomic, independent subtasks where possible
- Identify dependencies between subtasks
- Group parallelizable tasks
-
Generate execution plan:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 04c89a81a595
plan is a command published in the GitHub repository DesignPipe/exfig (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,054 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
figma-start
A command that prepares a designer's review branch from a developer's GitHub pull request. A pull request is a proposed set of code changes, and a branch is a separate line of project history.
figma-apply
A command that applies changes from a Figma design file to the current design branch, then commits, pushes, and checks the project build. Figma is a tool for creating and sharing interface designs.
handoff
A handoff command that creates a pull request from a designer's working branch to the developer's branch after design changes are ready for review. A pull request is a request to inspect and merge code changes.
gen-video
Generate video output in one of three modes: Remotion (programmatic React-based video), Gen-AI (shot prompt pack for Runway/Kling/Sora/Pika/Luma), or Remotion+Gen-AI (programmatic scaffold with AI footage embedded).
extract
Pull reusable components, tokens, and patterns out of screens into the design system. Creates shared widgets, theme extensions, and const token files.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.