Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevZonayed/MochiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/devzonayed/mochi/design-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/devzonayed/mochi/design-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/devzonayed/mochi/design-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/devzonayed/mochi/design-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/devzonayed/mochi/design-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01084 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
design-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You run a design-QA loop that bridges the browser MCP and Comment Mode. Comments
the agent creates appear to the human as live pins in the Mochi extension (they share
chrome.storage.local), and Comment Mode is auto-activated on the session tab so the
pins show up without the human opening it first. Inspect $ARGUMENTS and pick a mode.
Same Chrome required. Pins are stored per Chrome profile. The human sees them only in the same Chrome the agent drove — i.e. the one whose Mochi extension is connected (auto-connect on). If the MCP auto-launched its own Chrome window, review the comments in that window, not a separate Chrome.
Mode: fix / list (when $ARGUMENTS starts with fix or list)
browser_comment_list { sessionName }(pass the name afterfix/listto scope; omit to list this site's sessions for the current tab).- For
list: print the comments grouped by route (n · route · selector · text · severity · resolved) and stop. - For
fix: for each unresolved comment, locate the code that rendersselectoronroute, make the fix, and callbrowser_comment_resolve { id }. Work in dependency-safe order; commit logically. Report a summary (fixed / skipped + why). Do NOT mark resolved unless actually fixed.
Default mode: run the design-QA pass
1. Name the session meaningfully (project-wise, reflecting the latest changes). Run in the repo:
echo "$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)") · $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo main) — QA $(date +%Y-%m-%d)"
Use that string as sessionName for every browser_comment_add. (Re-running on the same branch/day appends to the same session.)
2. Open the app. Ensure a browser session: browser_session_start { url } (ask for / infer the dev URL, e.g. http://localhost:3000). Determine the routes to check — from $ARGUMENTS, the user, or by crawling visible links (browser_links).
3. For each route (and, when relevant, common breakpoints via browser_emulate_viewport — use widths that match the extension's device presets so pins are revealable in the device frame: 375, 390, 768, 1024, 1280, 1440; clear with browser_clear_emulation):
browser_navigate { url }, thenbrowser_screenshot,browser_audit_interactives { scope:"all" }, andbrowser_assert_no_errors { sinceNavigation:true }.- Judge design/UX. Default heuristics: spacing/alignment/rhythm, visual hierarchy, contrast & legibility, overflow/clipping/truncation, broken or empty/loading/error states, responsive breakage at the current width, obvious accessibility (labels, alt text, focus, target size), and copy (typos, clarity, consistency). If
$ARGUMENTSprovides a focus (a checklist, a design system / Figma reference, or a scope like "mobile + forms only"), prioritize it and stay on-target. - For each issue:
browser_comment_add { selector, text, sessionName, severity, breakpoint? }.selector= a precise CSS selector for the element (use refs frombrowser_snapshot/browser_audit_interactives). Check the response'slocated: if it isfalsethe selector didn't resolve — retry with a better selector so the pin lands on the real element.text= a concrete, actionable instruction (what's wrong + the fix), not a vague observation.severity=high | medium | low.breakpoint={ label, width }when the issue is breakpoint-specific (use a preset width above so it's visible in the device frame).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7bfa7f7c380c
design-qa is a command published in the GitHub repository DevZonayed/Mochi (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,084 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
excalidraw
Create or modify an editable Excalidraw diagram.
intercept
HTTP sniffer for tandem's Chrome via CDP: captures request+response bodies (including HttpOnly, CSRF tokens, private APIs). Subcommands: start, show, clear, count.
cookies
Exports cookies from tandem's Chrome via CDP (includes HttpOnly/Secure). Filter with --domain . Formats: list (table, default), json, curl, headers, netscape.
autoresearch
Autonomous research loop — iteratively edit, test, measure, keep/discard. Usage: /autoresearch [--budget 5m] [--provider ark].
gitlab-scrum
GitLab Scrum management - create/manage issues, labels, milestones, and boards. Use when user says: create issue, list issues, move issue, add label, scrum, kanban, backlog, or task tracking.
gitlab-sprint
Plan and manage GitLab sprints - create sprint milestones, populate with issues from backlog, track progress, close sprints. Use when user says: sprint, sprint planning, new sprint, close sprint, sprint review.