Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to DIGI-UW/OpenELIS-Global-2. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DIGI-UW/OpenELIS-Global-2/develop/.specify/core/commands/speckit.analyze.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DIGI-UW/OpenELIS-Global-2Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/digi-uw/openelis-global-2/speckit.analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/digi-uw/openelis-global-2/speckit.analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/digi-uw/openelis-global-2/speckit.analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/digi-uw/openelis-global-2/speckit.analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/digi-uw/openelis-global-2/speckit.analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01633 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00816 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00327 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to speckit.analyze — 114 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items
across the three core artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md) before
implementation. This command MUST run only after /speckit.tasks has
successfully produced a complete tasks.md.
Operating Constraints
STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
Constitution Authority: The project constitution
(/.specify/memory/constitution.md) is non-negotiable within this analysis
scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment
of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring
of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a
separate, explicit constitution update outside /speckit.analyze.
Execution Steps
1. Initialize Analysis Context
Run {SCRIPT} once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and
AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
From spec.md:
- Overview/Context
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
- User Stories
- Edge Cases (if present)
From plan.md:
- Architecture/stack choices
- Data Model references
- Phases
- Technical constraints
From tasks.md:
- Task IDs
- Descriptions
- Phase grouping
- Parallel markers [P]
- Referenced file paths
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 231 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 034a1d95887b
speckit.analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository DIGI-UW/OpenELIS-Global-2 (251 stars, last pushed today), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,633 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to speckit.analyze, differing in 114 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.