Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/dork-labs/dorkos/doc-updategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dork-labs/dorkosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dork-labs/dorkos/doc-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dork-labs/dorkos/doc-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dork-labs/dorkos/doc-update.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00408 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
doc-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Documentation Update Review Based on Spec
Review all documentation for updates needed because of the specification at $ARGUMENTS.
Step 1: Read the Specification
Read the spec and identify what it deprecates/removes, what it changes, and what it adds — these are the three lenses every doc gets reviewed through.
Step 2: Gather Documentation Files
Glob root-level *.md and contributing/*.md.
Step 3: Review Each Doc Against the Spec
For a handful of docs, review them inline. For a larger set, dispatch general-purpose agents in parallel (batch several docs per agent; launch all agents in a single message). Give each agent a 3-5 sentence summary of the spec's key changes plus its doc list, and have it report per file:
- Deprecated content — sections documenting functionality the spec removes; quote the doc text, cite the spec section, and mark severity: CRITICAL (following the doc would break) vs WARNING (merely outdated)
- Content requiring updates — quote the current text, explain what changed per the spec, suggest updated wording
- Missing content — new functionality that belongs in this doc, with suggested placement and draft text
- Or simply: "No updates required."
Step 4: Consolidate and Act
- Aggregate into a per-file summary table with priority counts: P0 deprecated-but-documented, P1 misleading, P2 missing new features, P3 minor.
- Present detailed findings ordered by priority across all files.
- Recommend which files need attention first and the rough effort for each.
- Ask whether to implement the suggested updates now.
Usage
/spec:doc-update specs/<slug>/02-specification.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 41 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A f398c4f6569b
doc-update is a command published in the GitHub repository dork-labs/dorkos (9 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 408 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
OPSX: Explore
Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements.
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
OPSX: Explore
Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements.
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).