Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/resolve-codeqlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dryvist/claude-code-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01061 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00531 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
resolve-codeql scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Resolve CodeQL
Fix CodeQL alerts in current repository only by analyzing, classifying, and delegating to specialized agents.
Scope Options
| Usage | Scope | Batch Size |
|---|---|---|
/resolve-codeql |
List all alerts | N/A |
/resolve-codeql fix |
Fix all alerts | 5 |
/resolve-codeql type:permissions |
Permissions alerts only | 5 |
/resolve-codeql type:injection |
Expression injection only | 5 |
/resolve-codeql type:other |
Other alert types | 5 |
/resolve-codeql file:path/to/workflow.yml |
Specific file only | N/A |
Related
codeql-permissions-auditoragent - Fix missing permissionscodeql-expression-injectoragent - Mitigate injection vulnerabilitiescodeql-generic-resolveragent - Handle other alert typescodeql-permission-classificationskill - Permission requirementsgithub-workflow-security-patternsskill - Security patterns
Workflow
Phase 1: Alert Discovery & Classification
Replace <OWNER> and <REPO> before running.
This endpoint needs a token carrying security_events: read (App
installation) or the security_events scope (classic PAT). Without it the call
returns 403 Resource not accessible by integration. That is a credential gap,
not an empty alert list — never read it as "no alerts". See the
gh-cli-patterns skill for how to tell that 403 apart from the one meaning
code scanning is simply disabled.
gh api 'repos/<OWNER>/<REPO>/code-scanning/alerts?state=open&per_page=100' --paginate \
--jq '.[] | {
number,
rule: .rule.id,
severity: .rule.severity,
location: .most_recent_instance.location.path,
message: .most_recent_instance.message.text
}'
Group results by rule type:
actions/missing-workflow-permissions-> Permissions categoryactions/expression-injection-> Expression injection category- Others -> Generic category
Apply scope filter (if provided):
type:permissions,type:injection,type:otherfile:<path>- only alerts in specific file
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 142 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 07c3e4b96e4b
resolve-codeql is a command published in the GitHub repository dryvist/claude-code-plugins (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 1,061 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
create_plan
Create detailed implementation plans through interactive research and iteration.
review-pr
Multi-agent PR review with four modes (review, re-review, self-review, address-feedback) - spawns parallel subagents, saves diff to /tmp for context efficiency, supports file exclusion patterns.
research_codebase
Document codebase as-is with thoughts directory for historical context.
iterate_plan
Iterate on existing implementation plans with thorough research and updates.
resume_handoff
Resume work from handoff document with context analysis and validation.
create_handoff
Create handoff document for transferring work to another session.