Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duolahypercho/fusion-fableWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-3)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-3"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-3/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-3"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-3.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00393 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00157 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
fusion-3 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the fusion skill on the task below, forcing the richest panel opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro:
Opus 4.8 (Agent subagent), GPT-5.5 (via codex exec), and Gemini 3.1 Pro (via agy, pseudo-TTY) answer
the SAME prompt IN PARALLEL, each independently with web + bash and none seeing the others' work → Opus 4.8
judges all three → Opus writes the final answer grounded in the analysis.
Follow the skill's SKILL.md exactly (preflight → fan out in parallel → judge picking the track that fits the task → grounded final deliverable → save provenance → present). For a research/analysis task, present the standard audit-trail sections (Consensus / Contradictions / Partial coverage / Unique insights / Blind spots); for a code/artifact task, run both candidates and merge them into one working result with a merge rationale. Pass the task verbatim to all three; no "lenses". Three families, one of each — do not add a second Opus run.
This command targets the FULL panel but degrades gracefully: if codex or agy is missing or a panelist
fails/times out, drop it, note the degraded panel in the output, and finish with what remains
(opus4.8-gpt5.5, then ultimately opus4.8-4.8) rather than aborting.
Task: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A d124465d4701
fusion-3 is a command published in the GitHub repository duolahypercho/fusion-fable (471 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 393 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
fusion-3 compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fusion-3duolahypercho/fusion-fable | Command | 471 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |