Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duolahypercho/fusion-fableWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00373 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
fusion-gemini scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the fusion skill on the task below, forcing the opus4.8-gemini3.1pro panel:
Opus 4.8 (Agent subagent) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (via agy, pseudo-TTY) answer the SAME prompt IN PARALLEL,
each independently with web + bash and neither seeing the other's work → Opus 4.8 judges both answers → Opus
writes the final answer grounded in the analysis.
Follow the skill's SKILL.md exactly (preflight → fan out in parallel → judge picking the track that fits the task → grounded final deliverable → save provenance → present). For a research/analysis task present the standard sections (Consensus / Contradictions / Partial coverage / Unique insights / Blind spots / Final answer); for a code/artifact task run both candidates and merge them into one working result with a merge rationale. Use exactly one Opus 4.8 panelist and one Gemini 3.1 Pro panelist — do NOT add a GPT-5.5 panelist or a second Opus run. Pass the task verbatim to both; no "lenses".
If the agy CLI is missing or the Gemini panelist fails/times out, drop it, record a one-line degradation
note, and fall back to opus4.8-4.8 (spawn a second independent Opus panelist) so the judge still sees two
blind answers — never abort because one CLI failed.
Task: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 22 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 72d01bcfc0cf
fusion-gemini is a command published in the GitHub repository duolahypercho/fusion-fable (472 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 373 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
music-suno-prompt
Grounded Suno prompt synthesis from local knowledge corpus + persona canon + label canon. No vibes-prompting.
laravel-ai-sdk
Build AI features with the first-party Laravel AI SDK (Laravel 13+); use the laravel:ai-sdk skill exactly as written.
audit-prompt
Evaluate an existing prompt for clarity, effectiveness, and edge cases.
develop-image-prompt.eval
Generates a detailed image generation prompt from a document or content description. Good output: a prompt that is specific, visual, non-abstract, includes style/composition/lighting guidance, and is calibrated to the specified dimensions and style options.
dare-llm-integration
Integração segura e eficiente com LLMs (Gemini, Claude, OpenAI, Ollama) em projetos DARE.
prompt-create
Create a new prompt following ground rules.