Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duolahypercho/fusion-fableWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duolahypercho/fusion-fable/fusion-gemini.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00373 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00149 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
fusion-gemini scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the fusion skill on the task below, forcing the opus4.8-gemini3.1pro panel:
Opus 4.8 (Agent subagent) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (via agy, pseudo-TTY) answer the SAME prompt IN PARALLEL,
each independently with web + bash and neither seeing the other's work → Opus 4.8 judges both answers → Opus
writes the final answer grounded in the analysis.
Follow the skill's SKILL.md exactly (preflight → fan out in parallel → judge picking the track that fits the task → grounded final deliverable → save provenance → present). For a research/analysis task present the standard sections (Consensus / Contradictions / Partial coverage / Unique insights / Blind spots / Final answer); for a code/artifact task run both candidates and merge them into one working result with a merge rationale. Use exactly one Opus 4.8 panelist and one Gemini 3.1 Pro panelist — do NOT add a GPT-5.5 panelist or a second Opus run. Pass the task verbatim to both; no "lenses".
If the agy CLI is missing or the Gemini panelist fails/times out, drop it, record a one-line degradation
note, and fall back to opus4.8-4.8 (spawn a second independent Opus panelist) so the judge still sees two
blind answers — never abort because one CLI failed.
Task: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 72d01bcfc0cf
fusion-gemini is a command published in the GitHub repository duolahypercho/fusion-fable (471 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 373 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
fusion-gemini compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fusion-geminiduolahypercho/fusion-fable | Command | 471 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| bootmicrosoft/PromptKit | Command | 113 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 14 | GitHub Copilot |
| music-suno-promptfrankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System | Command | 10 | yesterday | MIT | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| audit-promptOwl-Listener/ai-design-skills | Command | 199 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| laravel-ai-sdkjpcaparas/superpowers-laravel | Command | 157 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| vlm-ocr-evaluationscdenney/open-science-skills | Command | 69 | yesterday | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| dare-llm-integrationdewtech-technologies/dare-method | Command | 5 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |