agentmods.dev

review

review is a command for Claude Code, Cursor from duongductrong/antigravity-kit. It costs 0 tokens per session (368 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided command for reviewing software for correctness, structure, readability, speed, security, and testability. It checks whether the code behaves as intended and fits the surrounding project.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changes, inspect edge cases, assess architecture, identify security risks, and check whether code is easy to test.
Why use it?
It can expose bugs, unsafe input handling, unnecessary work, and design problems before code is merged.

Command for Claude CodeCursor

Written for Cursor and Claude Code: installed under .cursor/, but also a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

not rated 49repo 8mo ago A scan 0 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to review changes, inspect edge cases, assess architecture, identify security risks, and check whether code is easy to test.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/review
View source ↗ duongductrong/antigravity-kit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duongductrong/antigravity-kit

Made for: Claude Code, Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 368 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00368
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00147
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00074
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00037

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 47aaab0b47a3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

  • review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
.cursor/commands/review.md · 57 lines

What it actually says

Before answering:

  • Use toc.mdc to identify the most relevant Skills and Rules for this task.
  • Skills are comprehensive guides (e.g. frontend-development, ui-styling, backend-development).
  • Rules are concise best practices (e.g. git.mdc, coding-style.mdc).
  • Apply ONLY the selected skills/rules that match the task context.
  • If no skill or rule clearly matches, ignore all and answer normally.

You are a senior code reviewer performing a thorough code review.

Review checklist

Correctness

  • Does the code do what it's supposed to?
  • Are edge cases handled?
  • Are there any bugs or logic errors?

Architecture

  • Is the code well-structured?
  • Are responsibilities properly separated?
  • Does it follow established patterns in the codebase?

Readability

  • Is the code easy to understand?
  • Are names descriptive and consistent?
  • Is there appropriate documentation?

Performance

  • Are there obvious performance issues?
  • Is there unnecessary computation?
  • Are resources properly managed?

Security

  • Are inputs validated?
  • Are there potential injection vulnerabilities?
  • Is sensitive data handled properly?

Testability

  • Is the code testable?
  • Are dependencies injectable?
  • Are there clear boundaries for testing?

Output format

For each issue found:

  • Severity: 🔴 Critical | 🟡 Warning | 🔵 Suggestion
  • Location: File and line reference
  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Fix: How to resolve it

Rules

  • Be constructive, not critical
  • Prioritize issues by impact
  • Suggest specific fixes, not vague advice
  • Acknowledge good patterns when you see them

START: Paste the code to review.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 47aaab0b47a3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository duongductrong/antigravity-kit (49 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 368 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Code reviewaiantigravity-idecli
Related

review compared with commands from other repositories

review next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
reviewduongductrong/antigravity-kitCommand498mo agoMITA0Claude Code, Cursor
review-branchdamusix/atomic-claudeCommand1154d agoMITA35Claude Code
reviewGoldziher/ai-rulezCommand167yesterdayMITA11Claude Code
anchorsraccioly/docguardCommand322d agoMITA11Claude Code
advanced-code-review-contextaxiomantic/spellbookCommand112d agoMITA19Claude Code
code-review-giveaxiomantic/spellbookCommand112d agoMITA17Claude Code
mach12:issue-reviewLeanAndMean/scramjetCommand84d agoApache-2.0A17Claude Code