0a_problem_validation

0a_problem_validation is a command for Claude Code from eai-support/eai-gofer. It costs 22 tokens per session (7,825 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A command for checking whether a proposed business problem is real before designing a solution. It uses the “Five Whys” method, which repeatedly asks why a problem happens, plus stakeholder and market checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it at the start of a feature to create and validate its specification, plans, tasks, traceability record, and evidence. It supports problem analysis, stakeholder mapping, market research, and capability checks.
Why use it?
It helps prevent building for a poorly understood problem and keeps the specification, implementation, and evidence aligned. It also marks user journeys as unverified when browser checks cannot be completed.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Codex.

Part of the eai-gofer plugin — 4 skills, 28 commands, 42 agents, 3 hooks, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Use it at the start of a feature to create and validate its specification, plans, tasks, traceability record, and evidence. It supports problem analysis, stakeholder mapping, market research, and capability checks.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/0a_problem_validation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eai-support/eai-gofer

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install eai-gofer, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 28 commands, 42 agents, 3 hooks, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 0a_problem_validation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/0a_problem_validation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/0a_problem_validation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/0a_problem_validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/0a_problem_validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for 0a_problem_validation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/0a_problem_validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/0a_problem_validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 7,825 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.07825
Opus 5.5 $0.00009 $0.03130
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.01565
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00783

Measured 1mo ago against content hash c86ccc766142, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

0a_problem_validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.specify/commands/0a_problem_validation.md · 566 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 566 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


description: Validate business problem using 5 Whys analysis, stakeholder impact mapping, and market landscape research before any solution design

Gofer Problem Validation

Continuation And Stop Contract

  1. Preserve the requested scope and mode, including read-only, plan-only, research-only and MVP work. Keep the full applicable pipeline, stage functions, artifacts, reviews and validation; do not expand an MVP into an unapproved release.
  2. After a stage's required evidence is complete, read and follow the next internal file in .specify/commands/ in the same conversation. Do not require a numbered command or a host-specific skill dispatcher. Optional helpers remain optional; maintenance and control commands do not start delivery work.
  3. Treat the stated business goal as authority for ordinary planning, task ordering, design, diagnosis, repair, testing, and reversible repository changes within scope. Record material Gofer decisions with their reason and effect. Do not ask the user to choose implementation details that Gofer can safely decide.
  4. Ask only when the goal is unclear or changes, the action is irreversible or destructive, it changes security or access, it creates external cost or commitment, it changes production or public exposure, it requires missing authority or credentials, or it conflicts with an explicit user constraint. Record the exact reason before asking. missing or ambiguous approval is not approval when an approval boundary applies. Rejected, revoked, changed or unclear authority requires a pause.
  5. Pause for material scope, security, cost, deployment, destructive or protected files/boundary changes and any outstanding user gate. A business goal does not authorize publishing, spending, external changes, or bypassing host permissions. Complete safe authorized work without bypassing the blocked gate.
  6. A tool proposal is not execution. If host consent is required, wait for it. After the tool result or approved proposal returns, inspect the result and resume the next authorized action within approved scope; do not end with only a plan or a proposed tool call. A denied tool or unavailable capability must not be bypassed through another host or CLI.
  7. Use the current agent's available native tools. Optional Gofer/MCP tools are conveniences, not prerequisites. If the current agent lacks a required capability, report that limitation and the safe next action; do not pretend a handoff button transfers control automatically.
  8. Stop after research only when research-only work was requested, the user paused, or a real gate blocks progress. Otherwise continue to specification. At validation, report completion only when the requested scope's required evidence passes; failures remain unfinished work.
  9. Respect budget, context and retry limits from the existing loop contract. Repair safe within-scope failures only within those limits. Preserve a checkpoint before an orderly context stop; resume by reading its recorded stage and rechecking scope, approvals and evidence. Never claim an abrupt host termination was handled.
  10. Report concise Progress during work. At every controlled stop, report Progress, Stop reason and Next action, including the exact missing input or approval and unfinished work. Reasons are requested scope complete, user pause, approval required, material change, missing capability/access, validation blocked, or budget/context/retry limit. Stage completion alone is not pipeline completion.

Read the full file on GitHub · 566 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines c86ccc766142
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines cb371f0d1dd6
  3. 1mo ago Changed · -4 lines b904715cda97
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines 423216666775
  5. 1mo ago Changed 64cb286de214
  6. 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines 024be174e60b
  7. 1mo ago Changed · +23 lines ec138c547283
  8. 2mo ago Changed · +16 lines e7cb9c98da5b
  9. 2mo ago First seen · 502 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A e4103b0a668c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

0a_problem_validation is a command published in the GitHub repository eai-support/eai-gofer (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 7,825 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

0a_problem_validation compared with commands from other repositories

0a_problem_validation next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
0a_problem_validationeai-support/eai-goferCommand15d agoApache-2.0A22Claude Code
shipGuillemRoca/agent-skills-androidCommand51mo agoMITA29Claude Code
code-simplifyGuillemRoca/agent-skills-androidCommand51mo agoMITA0Claude Code
brainstormLeodorareluctant259/superpowers-zhCommand523d agoMITA15Claude Code
specGuillemRoca/agent-skills-androidCommand51mo agoMITA0Claude Code
testGuillemRoca/agent-skills-androidCommand51mo agoMITA0Claude Code
aivo_guideyuanchuan/aivoCommand19216d agoMITA0Claude Code